Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35511582›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2022

In-Depth Satellitome Analyses of 37 Drosophila Species Illuminate Repetitive DNA Evolution in the Drosophila Genus.

Leonardo G de Lima, Francisco J Ruiz-Ruano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Satellite DNA evolution in two holocentric species of Edessa true bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) with unusually high heterochromatin abundance.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Divergence and conservation of satellite DNA in the loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta): a comparative cytogenomic analysis.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Satellite DNA Genomics: The Ongoing Story.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cytogenomics ofGenes · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Leonardo G de LimaStowers Institute for Medical Research, 1000 E 50th Street, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6340-6065
Francisco J Ruiz-RuanoDepartment of Organismal Biology - Systematic Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5391-301X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Satellite DNAs (SatDNA) are ubiquitously present in eukaryotic genomes and have been recently associated with several biological roles. Understanding the evolution and significance of SatDNA requires an extensive comparison across multiple phylogenetic depths. We combined the RepeatExplorer pipeline and cytogenetic approaches to conduct a comprehensive identification and analysis of the satellitome in 37 species from the genus Drosophila. We identified 188 SatDNA-like families, 112 of them being characterized for the first time. Repeat analysis within a phylogenetic framework has revealed the deeply divergent nature of SatDNA sequences in the Drosophila genus. The SatDNA content varied from 0.54% of the D. arizonae genome to 38.8% of the D. albomicans genome, with the SatDNA content often following a phylogenetic signal. Monomer size and guanine-cytosine-content also showed extreme variation ranging 2-570 bp and 9.1-71.4%, respectively. SatDNA families are shared among closely related species, consistent with the SatDNA library hypothesis. However, we uncovered the emergence of species-specific SatDNA families through amplification of unique or low abundant sequences in a lineage. Finally, we found that genome sizes of the Sophophora subgenus are positively correlated with transposable element content, whereas genome size in the Drosophila subgenus is positively correlated with SatDNA. This finding indicates genome size could be driven by different categories of repetitive elements in each subgenus. Altogether, we conducted the most comprehensive satellitome analysis in Drosophila from a phylogenetic perspective and generated the largest catalog of SatDNA sequences to date, enabling future discoveries in SatDNA evolution and Drosophila genome architecture.

Indexed as

DrosophilaEvolution, MolecularAnimalsDNA, SatelliteDNA Transposable ElementsHumansPhylogenyDNA, SatelliteDNA Transposable ElementsDrosophilagenome size evolutionRepeatExplorerrepetitive DNAsatellite DNA

Identifiers

PMID35511582
PMCPMC9113345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.