Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35511363›Full record

ArticleMycorrhiza2022

Physiological and transcriptomic response of Medicago truncatula to colonization by high- or low-benefit arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

Kevin R Cope, Arjun Kafle, Jaya K Yakha, Philip E Pfeffer, Gary D Strahan, Kevin Garcia, Senthil Subramanian, Heike Bücking

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycorrhiza, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Differential root zone secretions and the role of root border cells in rhizosphere manipulation.Phytochemistry reviews : proceedings of the Phytochemical Society of Europe · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Root-Colonizing EndophyteInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. The Effects ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kevin R Cope *Biology and Microbiology Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0173-2871
Arjun Kafle *Biology and Microbiology Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5510-8391
Jaya K YakhaBiology and Microbiology Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2928-3625
Philip E PfefferAgricultural Research Service, Eastern Regional Research Center, USDA, 600 East Mermaid Lane, Wyndmoor, PA, 19038, USA.
Gary D StrahanAgricultural Research Service, Eastern Regional Research Center, USDA, 600 East Mermaid Lane, Wyndmoor, PA, 19038, USA.
Kevin GarciaDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0821-1024
Senthil SubramanianBiology and Microbiology Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7403-1139
Heike BückingBiology and Microbiology Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA. heike.buecking@missouri.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4040-0944

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2017-67014-26530National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2020-67013-31800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi form a root endosymbiosis with many agronomically important crop species. They enhance the ability of their host to obtain nutrients from the soil and increase the tolerance to biotic and abiotic stressors. However, AM fungal species can differ in the benefits they provide to their host plants. Here, we examined the putative molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation of the physiological response of Medicago truncatula to colonization by Rhizophagus irregularis or Glomus aggregatum, which have previously been characterized as high- and low-benefit AM fungal species, respectively. Colonization with R. irregularis led to greater growth and nutrient uptake than colonization with G. aggregatum. These benefits were linked to an elevated expression in the roots of strigolactone biosynthesis genes (NSP1, NSP2, CCD7, and MAX1a), mycorrhiza-induced phosphate (PT8), ammonium (AMT2;3), and nitrate (NPF4.12) transporters and the putative ammonium transporter NIP1;5. R. irregularis also stimulated the expression of photosynthesis-related genes in the shoot and the upregulation of the sugar transporters SWEET1.2, SWEET3.3, and SWEET 12 and the lipid biosynthesis gene RAM2 in the roots. In contrast, G. aggregatum induced the expression of biotic stress defense response genes in the shoots, and several genes associated with abiotic stress in the roots. This suggests that either the host perceives colonization by G. aggregatum as pathogen attack or that G. aggregatum can prime host defense responses. Our findings highlight molecular mechanisms that host plants may use to regulate their association with high- and low-benefit arbuscular mycorrhizal symbionts.

Indexed as

Ammonium CompoundsMedicago truncatulaMycorrhizaePlant RootsSymbiosisTranscriptomeAmmonium CompoundsArbuscular mycorrhizal fungiGibberellic acidNitrogenNutrient exchangePhosphorusStrigolactone

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.