Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35511275›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2022

Os acromiale: prevalence and associated patient-related factors-a population-based study of three thousand and fifty participants.

Cornelius Sebastian Fischer, Matthias Floß, Till Ittermann, Robin Bülow, Henry Völzke, Marc-Daniel Ahrend, Jörn Lange

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Prevalence of os acromiale in Japanese population: Comparison between patients with shoulder pain and asymptomatic subjects.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cornelius Sebastian FischerDepartment of Traumatology and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstraße 95, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. cfischer@bgu-tuebingen.de.
Matthias FloßClinic of Trauma, Reconstructive Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Till IttermannInstitute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Robin BülowInstitute of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Henry VölzkeInstitute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Marc-Daniel AhrendDepartment of Traumatology and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstraße 95, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Jörn LangeClinic of Trauma, Reconstructive Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald · DEBG Klinik Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe presence of os acromiale is of clinical relevance before performing shoulder surgery but ethnic differences and little information regarding associated factors seem to be present. Population-based studies to clarify these topics are essential so the purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence, anatomy, and associations of os acromiale in a general adult population.

methodsBoth shoulders of 3050 participants from the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP) were assessed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Associations with the os acromiale were calculated for sex, age, body height, body weight, and heavy mechanical oscillations on the upper extremity.

resultsIn total, 1.9% (58/3050) had an os acromiale, while 21 were unilateral left, 23 were unilateral right, and 14 were bilateral. Sixty-eight meso-acromions, three pre-acromions, and one meta-acromion were detected. Os acromiale were more frequent in men (right side: p = 0.037, left side: p = 0.005). Overall, no differences in sides (p = 0.808), to participants' age (right: p = 0.993, left: p = 0.499), body height (right side: p = 0.241, left side: p = 0.154), and the exposure to heavy mechanical oscillations on the upper extremity (right: p = 0.054, left: p = 0.117) were detected.

conclusionOur results support the genetic theory for the aetiology of the os acromiale due to the lower prevalence of the os acromiale in north-eastern Germany compared to the worldwide prevalence (1.9 to 7%) and the lacking association to lifestyle, age, gender, or sides. Additionally, it is important to be aware of possible os acromiale before surgery.

Indexed as

AcromionJoint DiseasesAdultGermanyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePrevalenceAssociated factorsMRIOs acromialePopulation-basedShoulder

Identifiers

PMID35511275
PMCPMC9166870
OpenAlexW4229005371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.