Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35511271›Full record

SynthesisChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2022

Intraoperative MRI versus intraoperative ultrasound in pediatric brain tumor surgery: is expensive better than cheap? A review of the literature.

Carlo Giussani, Andrea Trezza, Vittorio Ricciuti, Andrea Di Cristofori, Andrea Held, Valeria Isella, Maura Massimino

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The Value of Intraoperative Ultrasound in Brain Surgery.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2024
    Article
  8. From Microscopic to Exoscopic Microsurgery: Are We Facing a Change of Paradigm?Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2024
    Article
  9. Technical evolution of pediatric neurosurgery: the evolution of intraoperative imaging.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carlo GiussaniNeurosurgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, Neuroscience Center, University of Milano-Bicocca, Ospedale San Gerardo, Monza, Italy. carlo.giussani@unimib.it.ORCID 0000-0002-9033-2927
Andrea TrezzaNeurosurgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, Neuroscience Center, University of Milano-Bicocca, Ospedale San Gerardo, Monza, Italy.
Vittorio RicciutiNeurosurgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, Neuroscience Center, University of Milano-Bicocca, Ospedale San Gerardo, Monza, Italy.
Andrea Di CristoforiNeurosurgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, Neuroscience Center, University of Milano-Bicocca, Ospedale San Gerardo, Monza, Italy.
Andrea HeldNeurosurgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, Neuroscience Center, University of Milano-Bicocca, Ospedale San Gerardo, Monza, Italy.
Valeria IsellaOspedale San Gerardo, University of Milano - Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Maura MassiminoPediatric Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe extent of brain tumor resection (EOR) is a fundamental prognostic factor in pediatric neuro-oncology in association with the histology. In general, resection aims at gross total resection (GTR). Intraoperative imaging like intraoperative US (iOUS) and MRI have been developed in order to find any tumoral remnant but with different costs. Aim of our work is to review the current literature in order to better understand the differences between costs and efficacy of MRI and iOUS to evaluate tumor remnants intraoperatively.

methodsWe reviewed the existing literature on PubMed until 31st December 2021 including the sequential keywords "intraoperative ultrasound and pediatric brain tumors", "iUS and pediatric brain tumors", "intraoperative magnetic resonance AND pediatric brain tumors", and "intraoperative MRI AND pediatric brain tumors.

resultsA total of 300 papers were screened through analysis of title and abstract; 254 were excluded. After selection, a total of 23 articles were used for this systematic review. Among the 929 patients described, a total of 349(38%) of the cases required an additional resection after an iMRI scan. GTR was measured on 794 patients (data of 69 patients lost), and it was achieved in 552(70%) patients. In case of iOUS, GTR was estimated in 291 out of 379 (77%) cases. This finding was confirmed at the post-operative MRI in 256(68%) cases.

conclusionsThe analysis of the available literature demonstrates that expensive equipment does not always mean better. In fact, for the majority of pediatric brain tumors, iOUS is comparable to iMRI in estimating the EOR.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsNeurosurgical ProceduresChildHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesUltrasonographyExtent of resectionIntraoperative MRIIntraoperative USPediatric brain tumorsPediatric neurosurgery

Identifiers

PMID35511271
OpenAlexW4229050757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.