Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35511180›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2022

Efficacy and Safety of Difelikefalin in Japanese Patients With Moderate to Severe Pruritus Receiving Hemodialysis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Ichiei Narita, Yoshiharu Tsubakihara, Takuma Uchiyama, Shota Okamura, Nobuyo Oya, Naoki Takahashi, Fumitake Gejyo, MR13A9-4 Trial Investigators

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03802617 (A Phase II Clinical Study of MR13A9 in Hemodialysis Patients With Pruritus.), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03802617 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase II Clinical Study of MR13A9 in Hemodialysis Patients With Pruritus.

TypeinterventionalSponsorKissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Ran2019 to 2019Enrolled247ConditionsUremic PruritusArmsMR13A9, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. European S2k Guideline on Chronic PruritusActa dermato-venereologica · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. [Clinical Research Progress on Using κ-Opioid Receptor Agonists to Treat Uremic Pruritus].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Ichiei NaritaDivision of Clinical Nephrology and Rheumatology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.
Yoshiharu TsubakiharaGraduate School of Medical Safety Management, Jikei University of Health Care Sciences, Osaka, Japan.
Takuma UchiyamaKissei Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Shota OkamuraKissei Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobuyo OyaMaruishi Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, Osaka, Japan.
Naoki TakahashiMaruishi Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, Osaka, Japan.
Fumitake GejyoNiigata University of Pharmacy and Applied Life Sciences, Niigata, Japan.
MR13A9-4 Trial Investigators
Clinical Trial Investigators · USKissei Pharmaceutical (Japan) · JPMaruishi Pharmaceutical (Japan) · JPGraduate School of Health Care Sciences, Jikei Institute · JPNiigata University · JPNiigata University of Pharmacy and Medical and Life Sciences · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Patients with pruritus receiving hemodialysis frequently experience oppressive physical and psychiatric symptoms that directly affect their quality of life and increase mortality. However, treatment options are limited. Objective: To determine the clinically recommended dose of difelikefalin, a κ-opioid receptor agonist, based on the efficacy, dose response, safety, and pharmacokinetics. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-arm phase 2 trial was conducted from February 1, 2019, to October 22, 2019, at 94 sites in Japan. Patients with moderate to severe pruritus receiving hemodialysis were enrolled. Interventions: Difelikefalin (0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 μg/kg) and placebo were intravenously administered 3 times a week at the end of each hemodialysis session for 8 weeks. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary end point was the change from baseline in the weekly mean Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score at week 8. Secondary outcomes measured changes in itch-related quality-of-life score using the Skindex-16 and 5-D itch scale. Safety was assessed according to adverse events, laboratory tests, vital signs, body weight, and 12-lead electrocardiogram. Results: A total of 247 Japanese patients (186 male [75%]; mean [SD] age, 64.5 [11.7] years) were randomized to placebo (n = 63), 0.25 μg/kg of difelikefalin (n = 61), 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin (n = 61), or 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin (n = 62). The changes from baseline in the adjusted mean (SE) of the 24-hour Worst Itching Intensity NRS score at week 8 were -2.86 (0.29) in the placebo group, -2.97 (0.29) in the 0.25 μg/kg of difelikefalin group, -3.65 (0.30) in the 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin group, and -3.64 (0.30) in the 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin group. Significant differences were found in the 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin group (adjusted mean difference, -0.80; 95% CI, -1.55 to -0.04; P = .04) and the 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin group (adjusted mean difference, -0.78; 95% CI, -1.54 to -0.03; P = .04) compared with placebo. The Skindex-16 overall score and 5-D itch scale total score indicated an improvement with treatment with 0.5 and 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin (adjusted weekly mean [SE] Skindex-16 overall score at week 8, -27.79 [2.05]; 95% CI, -31.83 to -23.74 for 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin and -22.69 [2.04]; 95% CI, -26.71 to -18.68 for 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin; adjusted weekly mean [SE] 5-D itch scale total score at week 8, -6.5 [0.4]; 95% CI, -7.2 to -5.8 for 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin and -6.8 [0.3]; 95% CI, -7.5 to -6.2 for 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin). The incidence of adverse events was 67% (42 of 63 patients) in the placebo group, 72% (44 of 61 patients) in the 0.25 μg/kg of difelikefalin group, 77% (47 of 61 patients) in the 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin group, and 85% (53 of 62 patients) in the 1.0 μg/kg of difelikefalin group. No dependency was reported. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this phase 2 randomized clinical trial of difelikefalin suggest that 0.5 μg/kg of difelikefalin should be the clinically recommended dose as a new option for treating moderate to severe pruritus in patients undergoing hemodialysis because of its efficacy, acceptable tolerability, and manageable safety profile. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03802617.

Indexed as

PruritusQuality of LifeFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedPiperidinesRenal DialysisdifelikefalinPiperidines

Identifiers

PMID35511180
PMCPMC9073569
OpenAlexW4229014255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.