Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35511164›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2023

Biomarker A+T-: is this Alzheimer's disease or not? A combined CSF and pathology study.

Eleonora M Vromen, Sterre C M de Boer, Charlotte E Teunissen, Annemieke Rozemuller, Anne Sieben, Maria Bjerke, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, Pieter Jelle Visser, Femke H Bouwman, Sebastiaan Engelborghs and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Italian intersocietal recommendations for restructuring the diagnostic-therapeutic pathway for the implementation and appropriate use of anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies in Alzheimer's disease.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Considerations in the clinical use of amyloid PET and CSF biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Is Alzheimer disease a disease?Nature reviews. Neurology · 2024
    Review
  19. Evaluation of ATNNeurology · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Eleonora M VromenAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sterre C M de BoerAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Charlotte E TeunissenDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Neurochemistry Lab and Biobank, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Annemieke RozemullerDepartment of Pathology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anne SiebenInstitute Born-Bunge, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Maria BjerkeClinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Biology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel and Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Pieter Jelle VisserAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Femke H BouwmanAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sebastiaan EngelborghsDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0304-9785
Betty M TijmsAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2612-1797
Amsterdam Neuroscience · NLVrije Universiteit Brussel · BEKarolinska Institutet · SEUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biological definition of Alzheimer's disease using CSF biomarkers requires abnormal levels of both amyloid (A) and tau (T). However, biomarkers and corresponding cutoffs may not always reflect the presence or absence of pathology. Previous studies suggest that up to 32% of individuals with autopsy-confirmed Alzheimer's disease show normal CSF p-tau levels in vivo, but these studies are sparse and had small sample sizes. Therefore, in three independent autopsy cohorts, we studied whether or not CSF A+T- excluded Alzheimer's disease based on autopsy. We included 215 individuals, for whom ante-mortem CSF collection and autopsy had been performed, from three cohorts: (i) the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort (ADC) [n = 80, 37 (46%) Alzheimer's disease at autopsy, time between CSF collection and death 4.5 ± 2.9 years]; (ii) the Antwerp Dementia Cohort (DEM) [n = 92, 84 (91%) Alzheimer's disease at autopsy, time CSF collection to death 1.7 ± 2.3 years]; and (iii) the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) [n = 43, 31 (72%) Alzheimer's disease at autopsy, time CSF collection to death 5.1 ± 2.5 years]. Biomarker profiles were based on dichotomized CSF Aβ1-42 and p-tau levels. The accuracy of CSF AT profiles to detect autopsy-confirmed Alzheimer's disease was assessed. Lastly, we investigated whether the concordance of AT profiles with autopsy diagnosis improved when CSF was collected closer to death in 9 (10%) DEM and 30 (70%) ADNI individuals with repeated CSF measurements available. In total, 50-73% of A+T- individuals and 100% of A+T+ individuals had Alzheimer's disease at autopsy. Amyloid status showed the highest accuracy to detect autopsy-confirmed Alzheimer's disease (accuracy, sensitivity and specificity in the ADC: 88%, 92% and 84%; in the DEM: 87%, 94% and 12%; and in the ADNI cohort: 86%, 90% and 75%, respectively). The addition of CSF p-tau did not further improve these estimates. We observed no differences in demographics or degree of Alzheimer's disease neuropathology between A+T- and A+T+ individuals with autopsy-confirmed Alzheimer's disease. All individuals with repeated CSF measurements remained stable in Aβ1-42 status during follow-up. None of the Alzheimer's disease individuals with a normal p-tau status changed to abnormal; however, four (44%) DEM individuals and two (7%) ADNI individuals changed from abnormal to normal p-tau status over time, and all had Alzheimer's disease at autopsy. In summary, we found that up to 73% of A+T- individuals had Alzheimer's disease at autopsy. This should be taken into account in both research and clinical settings.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkersHumansPeptide FragmentsSensitivity and Specificitytau ProteinsAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkersPeptide Fragmentstau ProteinsAlzheimer’s diseaseAT(N)autopsybiomarkerCSF

Identifiers

PMID35511164
PMCPMC9976983
OpenAlexW4225550769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.