Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35511090›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2022

Self-matched learning to construct treatment decision rules from electronic health records.

Tianchen Xu, Yuan Chen, Donglin Zeng, Yuanjia Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tianchen XuDepartment of Biostatistics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0102-7630
Yuan ChenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8734-007X
Donglin ZengDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Yuanjia WangDepartment of Biostatistics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1510-3315

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Statistical Methods for Integrating Mixed-type Biomarkers and Phenotypes in Neurodegenerative Disease ModelingR01NS073671 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WANG, YUANJIA · 2011 to 2025
$3.9M
Statistical and Machine Learning Methods to Improve Dynamic Treatment Regimens Estimation Using Real World Data.R01GM124104 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Yuanjia Wang, Donglin Zeng · 2018 to 2026
$3.1M
Machine Learning Methods for Optimizing Individualized Treatment Strategies for Precision PsychiatryR01MH123487 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WANG, YUANJIA · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
Integrative Learning to Combine Evidence for Personalized Treatment Strategies.R21MH117458 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WANG, YUANJIA · 2018 to 2019
$446k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIGMS NIH HHS GM124104NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124104NIMH NIH HHS MH123487NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH123487NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH117458NINDS NIH HHS NS073671NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS073671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic health records (EHRs) collected from large-scale health systems provide rich subject-specific information on a broad patient population at a lower cost compared to randomized controlled trials. Thus, EHRs may serve as a complementary resource to provide real-world data to construct individualized treatment rules (ITRs) and achieve precision medicine. However, in the absence of randomization, inferring treatment rules from EHR data may suffer from unmeasured confounding. In this article, we propose a self-matched learning method inspired by the self-controlled case series (SCCS) design to mitigate this challenge. We alleviate unmeasured time-invariant confounding between patients by matching different periods of treatments within the same patient (self-controlled matching) to infer the optimal ITRs. The proposed method constructs a within-subject matched value function for optimizing ITRs and bears similarity to the SCCS design. We examine assumptions that ensure Fisher consistency, and show that our method requires weaker assumptions on unmeasured confounding than alternative methods. Through extensive simulation studies, we demonstrate that self-matched learning has comparable performance to other existing methods when there are no unmeasured confounders, but performs markedly better when unobserved time-invariant confounders are present, which is often the case for EHRs. Sensitivity analyses show that the proposed method is robust under different scenarios. Finally, we apply self-matched learning to estimate the optimal ITRs from type 2 diabetes patient EHRs, which shows our estimated decision rules lead to greater advantages in reducing patients' diabetes-related complications.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Electronic Health RecordsComputer SimulationHumansMachine LearningPrecision Medicineindividualized treatment rulemachine learningprecision medicineself-controlled case series

Identifiers

PMID35511090
PMCPMC9283315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.