Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35510843›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

Using positional information to provide context for biological image analysis with MorphoGraphX 2.0.

Sören Strauss, Adam Runions, Brendan Lane, Dennis Eschweiler, Namrata Bajpai, Nicola Trozzi, Anne-Lise Routier-Kierzkowska, Saiko Yoshida, Sylvia Rodrigues da Silveira, Athul Vijayan and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cell fate acquisition at a de novo developmental boundary in the maize leaf.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Sören StraussMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Department of Comparative Development and Genetics, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7141-1750
Adam RunionsMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Department of Comparative Development and Genetics, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7758-7423
Brendan LaneMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Department of Comparative Development and Genetics, Cologne, Germany.
Dennis EschweilerInstitute of Imaging and Computer Vision, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Namrata BajpaiMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Department of Comparative Development and Genetics, Cologne, Germany.
Nicola TrozziMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Department of Comparative Development and Genetics, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3951-6533
Anne-Lise Routier-KierzkowskaIRBV, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0383-0811
Saiko YoshidaMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Department of Comparative Development and Genetics, Cologne, Germany.
Sylvia Rodrigues da SilveiraIRBV, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Athul VijayanPlant Developmental Biology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1837-6359
Rachele TofanelliPlant Developmental Biology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5196-1122
Mateusz MajdaMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Department of Comparative Development and Genetics, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3405-2901
Emillie EchevinIRBV, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Constance Le GloanecIRBV, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7959-6307
Hana Bertrand-RakusovaIRBV, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Milad AdibiMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Department of Comparative Development and Genetics, Cologne, Germany.
Kay SchneitzPlant Developmental Biology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6688-0539
George W BasselSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Daniel KierzkowskiIRBV, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1947-8691
Johannes StegmaierInstitute of Imaging and Computer Vision, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4072-3759
Miltos TsiantisMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Department of Comparative Development and Genetics, Cologne, Germany.
Richard S SmithMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Department of Comparative Development and Genetics, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9220-0787
Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research · DEUniversité de Montréal · CAJohn Innes Centre · GBTechnical University of Munich · DERWTH Aachen University · DEUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P013511/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S002804/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positional information is a central concept in developmental biology. In developing organs, positional information can be idealized as a local coordinate system that arises from morphogen gradients controlled by organizers at key locations. This offers a plausible mechanism for the integration of the molecular networks operating in individual cells into the spatially coordinated multicellular responses necessary for the organization of emergent forms. Understanding how positional cues guide morphogenesis requires the quantification of gene expression and growth dynamics in the context of their underlying coordinate systems. Here, we present recent advances in the MorphoGraphX software (Barbier de Reuille et al., 2015⁠) that implement a generalized framework to annotate developing organs with local coordinate systems. These coordinate systems introduce an organ-centric spatial context to microscopy data, allowing gene expression and growth to be quantified and compared in the context of the positional information thought to control them.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedSoftwareMorphogenesisA. thalianaconvolutional neural networksdevelopmental biologymorphogenesisplant biologypositional informationquantificationsegmentation

Identifiers

PMID35510843
PMCPMC9159754
OpenAlexW4229063650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.