Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35510622›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

Heterogeneity of the GFP fitness landscape and data-driven protein design.

Louisa Gonzalez Somermeyer, Aubin Fleiss, Alexander S Mishin, Nina G Bozhanova, Anna A Igolkina, Jens Meiler, Maria-Elisenda Alaball Pujol, Ekaterina V Putintseva, Karen S Sarkisyan, Fyodor A Kondrashov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Descent from a common ancestor restricts exploration of protein sequence space.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Protein stability models fail to capture epistatic interactions of double point mutations.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Louisa Gonzalez SomermeyerInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9139-5383
Aubin FleissSynthetic Biology Group, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, London, United Kingdom.
Alexander S MishinShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0002-4935-7030
Nina G BozhanovaDepartment of Chemistry, Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2164-5698
Anna A IgolkinaGregor Mendel Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8851-9621
Jens MeilerDepartment of Chemistry, Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8945-193X
Maria-Elisenda Alaball PujolSynthetic Biology Group, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1868-2674
Ekaterina V PutintsevaLabGenius, London, United Kingdom.
Karen S SarkisyanSynthetic Biology Group, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5375-6341
Fyodor A KondrashovInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8243-4694

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UP_1605/9Medical Research Council UKRI MC-A658-5QEA0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of protein fitness landscapes reveal biophysical constraints guiding protein evolution and empower prediction of functional proteins. However, generalisation of these findings is limited due to scarceness of systematic data on fitness landscapes of proteins with a defined evolutionary relationship. We characterized the fitness peaks of four orthologous fluorescent proteins with a broad range of sequence divergence. While two of the four studied fitness peaks were sharp, the other two were considerably flatter, being almost entirely free of epistatic interactions. Mutationally robust proteins, characterized by a flat fitness peak, were not optimal templates for machine-learning-driven protein design - instead, predictions were more accurate for fragile proteins with epistatic landscapes. Our work paves insights for practical application of fitness landscape heterogeneity in protein engineering.

Indexed as

Genetic FitnessModels, GeneticMutationProteinsProteinscomputational biologyE. colievolutionary biologyfitness landscapeGFPmachine learningmolecular evolutionprotein engineeringsystems biology

Identifiers

PMID35510622
PMCPMC9119679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.