Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35510587›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2022

Introducing and integrating perinatal mental health screening: Development of an equity-informed evidence-based approach.

Rebecca Blackmore, Jacqueline A Boyle, Kylie M Gray, Suzanne Willey, Nicole Highet, Melanie Gibson-Helm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Barriers to and facilitators of access to mental health services among pregnant adolescents and young mothers in Belize.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Introducing and integrating perinatal mental health screening: Development of an equity-informed evidence-based approach.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  14. Disrupting patterns of exclusion in participatory spaces: Involving people from vulnerable populations.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rebecca BlackmoreMonash Centre for Health, Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4617-0609
Jacqueline A BoyleMonash Centre for Health, Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3616-1637
Kylie M GrayCentre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research (CEDAR), Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6518-4240
Suzanne WilleyMonash Centre for Health, Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1314-0745
Nicole HighetCentre of Perinatal Excellence (COPE), Melbourne, Australia.
Melanie Gibson-HelmMonash Centre for Health, Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5043-8786

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnancy is a time of increased risk for developing or re-experiencing mental illness. Perinatal mental health screening for all women is recommended in many national guidelines, but a number of systems-level and individual barriers often hinder policy implementation. These barriers result in missed opportunities for detection and early intervention and are likely to be experienced disproportionately by women from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds, including women of refugee backgrounds. The objectives of this study were to develop a theory-informed, evidence-based guide for introducing and integrating perinatal mental health screening across health settings and to synthesize the learnings from an implementation initiative and multisectoral partnership between the Centre of Perinatal Excellence (COPE), and a university-based research centre. COPE is a nongovernmental organization (NGO) commissioned to update the Australian perinatal mental health guidelines, train health professionals and implement digital screening.

methodsIn this case study, barriers to implementation were prospectively identified and strategies to overcome them were developed. A pilot perinatal screening programme for depression and anxiety with a strong health equity focus was implemented and evaluated at a large public maternity service delivering care to a culturally diverse population of women in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia, including women of refugee background. Strategies that were identified preimplementation and postevaluation were mapped to theoretical frameworks. An implementation guide was developed to support future policy, planning and decision-making by healthcare organizations.

resultsUsing a behavioural change framework (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour Model), the key barriers, processes and outcomes are described for a real-world example designed to maximize accessibility, feasibility and acceptability. A Programme Logic Model was developed to demonstrate the relationships of the inputs, which included stakeholder consultation, resource development and a digital screening platform, with the outcomes of the programme. A seven-stage implementation guide is presented for use in a range of healthcare settings.

conclusionsThese findings describe an equity-informed, evidence-based approach that can be used by healthcare organizations to address common systems and individual-level barriers to implement perinatal depression and anxiety screening guidelines. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: These results present strategies that were informed by prior research involving patients and staff from a large public antenatal clinic in Melbourne, Australia. This involved interviews with health professionals from the clinic such as midwives, obstetricians, perinatal mental health and refugee health experts and interpreters. Interviews were also conducted with women of refugee background who were attending the clinic for antenatal care. A steering committee was formed to facilitate the implementation of the perinatal mental health screening programme comprising staff from key hospital departments, GP liaison, refugee health and well-being, the NGO COPE and academic experts in psychology, midwifery, obstetrics and public health. This committee met fortnightly for 2 years to devise strategies to address the barriers, implement and evaluate the programme. A community advisory group was also formed that involved women from eight different countries, some of refugee background, who had recently given birth at the health service. This committee met bimonthly and was instrumental in planning the implementation and evaluation such as recruitment strategies, resources and facilitating an understanding of the cultural complexity of the women participating in the study.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersRefugeesAustraliaFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMental HealthPregnancyearly pregnancyhealth services researchmaternity servicesperinatalpsychiatrypsychology

Identifiers

PMID35510587
PMCPMC9615047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.