Observational studyCirculation. Heart failure2022
Cardiogenic Shock From Heart Failure Versus Acute Myocardial Infarction: Clinical Characteristics, Hospital Course, and 1-Year Outcomes.
Observational study in Circulation. Heart failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 50 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Implementation of a Cardiogenic Shock Team and Clinical Outcomes (INOVA-SHOCK Registry)
The Role of Swan-Ganz Catheter in Hemodynamic Resuscitation for Patients With Cardiogenic Shock
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Outcomes of Direct Impella Use vs. Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump (IABP)-to- Impella Escalation Strategy in Cardiogenic Shock: Insights from the National Inpatient Sample.Research square · 2026Article
- Palliative and End-of-Life Care Utilization in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Population-Based Study.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes of Diabetes Subtypes in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock: A Nationwide Analysis.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- The Challenge of Cardiogenic Shock Transfers: The Devil in the Details.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
- Clinical Profiles and Prognostic Patterns in Critically Ill Cardiac Patients Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Five-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cardiogenic Shock Systems of Care Best Practices. Part 1: Prehospital and Emergency Department Evaluation and Management.US cardiology · 2026Review
- Factors associated with native heart survival and intermediate-term outcomes in acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock.European heart journal open · 2026Article
- Cardiogenic Shock Systems of Care Best Practices, Part 3: Regionalization of Care, Organizational Components, and Critical Care Transport Medicine.US cardiology · 2026Review
- Cardiogenic shock in cancer: differences in use of temporary mechanical circulatory support, invasive hemodynamic assessment and patient outcomes.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Cardiogenic Shock Management in the Modern Era: A Narrative Review of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Safety and Prognostic Implications of Mechanical Circulatory Support-Assisted Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair: The OCEAN-Mitral Registry.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Observational
- A Proposed Algorithm for the Management of Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Based on Contemporary Knowledge and Gaps in Evidence.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- A Contemporary Guide of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Cardiogenic Shock.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Impact of standardized team-based care on cardiogenic shock outcomes over time.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Special topics: heart failure-related cardiogenic shock, valvular heart disease and end-stage renal disease. Part 4 of the International Expert Opinion Series on Acute Heart Failure Management.Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
- Cardiogenic shock: a review of contemporary approaches and ongoing challenges.Future cardiology · 2025Review
- Timing of inotropic support is associated with mortality in patients with acute decompensated heart failure-associated cardiogenic shock.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Article
- Management Patterns and Outcomes of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
- Impact of Baseline Cardiogenic Shock Severity on Outcomes in Patients Treated With Impella Device.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Observational
- Treatment of heart failure related cardiogenic shock: Time to fill the evidence gap.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLittle is known about clinical characteristics, hospital course, and longitudinal outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) related to heart failure (HF-CS) compared to acute myocardial infarction (AMI; CS related to AMI [AMI-CS]).
methodsWe examined in-hospital and 1-year outcomes of 520 (219 AMI-CS, 301 HF-CS) consecutive patients with CS (January 3, 2017-December 31, 2019) in a single-center registry.
resultsMean age was 61.5±13.5 years, 71% were male, 22% were Black patients, and 63% had chronic kidney disease. The HF-CS cohort was younger (58.5 versus 65.6 years,
conclusionsPatients with HF-CS were younger, and despite lower cardiac power output and higher pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, less likely to receive vasopressors or temporary mechanical circulatory support. Although patients with HF-CS had lower in-hospital and 1-year mortality, both cohorts experienced similarly high rates of postdischarge major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events and 30-day readmission, highlighting that both cohorts warrant careful long-term follow-up. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT03378739.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.