Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35510511›Full record

Observational studyBMJ paediatrics open2021

Physiological responses to cuddling babies with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy during therapeutic hypothermia: an observational study.

David Odd, Satomi Okano, Jenny Ingram, Peter S Blair, Amiel Billietop, Peter J Fleming, Marianne Thoresen, Ela Chakkarapani

Open access · diamondAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ paediatrics open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. 'Opportunity to bond and a sense of normality': Parent and staff views of cuddling babies undergoing therapeutic hypothermia in neonatal intensive care: 'CoolCuddle'.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

David OddPopulation Medicine, Cardiff University, School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
Satomi OkanoNeonatology, St Michael's Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Jenny IngramCentre for Academic Child Health, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
Peter S BlairCentre for Child and Adolescent Health, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
Amiel BillietopNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, North Bristol NHS Trust, Westbury on Trym, Bristol, UK.
Peter J FlemingCentre for Academic Child Health, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
Marianne ThoresenTranslational Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
Ela ChakkarapaniNeonatology, St Michael's Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK Ela.Chakkarapani@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3380-047X
University of Bristol · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GBCardiff University · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine whether parents cuddling infants during therapeutic hypothermia (TH) would affect cooling therapy, cardiorespiratory or neurophysiological measures. The secondary aim was to explore parent-infant bonding, maternal postnatal depression and breastfeeding.

designProspective observational study.

settingTwo tertiary neonatal intensive care units (NICU).

participantsParents and their term-born infants (n=27) receiving TH and intensive care for neonatal hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy.

interventionsCuddling up to 2 hours during TH using a standard operating procedure developed in the study (CoolCuddle).

main outcome measuresMean difference in temperature, cardiorespiratory and neurophysiological variables before, during and after the cuddle. Secondary outcomes were parental bonding, maternal postnatal depression and breastfeeding.

resultsDuring 70 CoolCuddles (115 cumulative hours), there were measurable increases in rectal temperature (0.07°C (0.03 to 0.10)) and upper margin of amplitude-integrated electroencephalogram (1.80 µV (0.83 to 2.72)) and decreases in oxygen saturations (-0.57% (-1.08 to -0.05)) compared with the precuddle period. After the cuddle, there was an increase in end-tidal CO

conclusionIn this small study, CoolCuddle was associated with clinically non-significant, but measurable, changes in temperature, cardiorespiration and neurophysiology. No infant met the criteria to stop the cuddles or had any predefined adverse events. CoolCuddle may improve breastfeeding and requires investigation in different NICU settings.

Indexed as

Depression, PostpartumHypothermia, InducedHypoxia-Ischemia, BrainBreast FeedingFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, Neonatalneonatologyphysiology

Identifiers

PMID35510511
PMCPMC8679081
OpenAlexW4285745695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.