Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35510192›Full record

ArticlePatterns (New York, N.Y.)2022

Representing the dynamics of high-dimensional data with non-redundant wavelets.

Shanshan Jia, Xingyi Li, Tiejun Huang, Jian K Liu, Zhaofei Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Zooming in on the brain via data science.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shanshan JiaInstitute for Artificial Intelligence, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Xingyi LiCenter for Neurointelligence, School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China.
Tiejun HuangInstitute for Artificial Intelligence, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Jian K LiuSchool of Computing, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Zhaofei YuInstitute for Artificial Intelligence, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A crucial question in data science is to extract meaningful information embedded in high-dimensional data into a low-dimensional set of features that can represent the original data at different levels. Wavelet analysis is a pervasive method for decomposing time-series signals into a few levels with detailed temporal resolution. However, obtained wavelets are intertwined and over-represented across levels for each sample and across different samples within one population. Here, using neuroscience data of simulated spikes, experimental spikes, calcium imaging signals, and human electrocorticography signals, we leveraged conditional mutual information between wavelets for feature selection. The meaningfulness of selected features was verified to decode stimulus or condition with high accuracy yet using only a small set of features. These results provide a new way of wavelet analysis for extracting essential features of the dynamics of spatiotemporal neural data, which then enables to support novel model design of machine learning with representative features.

Indexed as

calcium imagingconditional informationdimensionality reductionECoGfeature selectionmutual informationneural codingneural spikeswavelet analysis

Identifiers

PMID35510192
PMCPMC9058841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.