ArticlePatterns (New York, N.Y.)2022
Privacy-preserving local analysis of digital trace data: A proof-of-concept.
Article in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Humanitarian data infrastructures for missing migrants: A multimodal and ethics-integrated framework.Open research Europe · 2026Article
- Digital Data Donation With Adolescents.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025Article
- Requirements for occupational exposure limits in psychosocial risk assessment: What we know, what we don't know and what we can learn from other disciplines.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2025Review
- Data Donation as a Method to Measure Physical Activity in Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Web Survey Assessing Consent Rates, Donation Success, and Bias.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Best practices for studies using digital data donation.Quality & quantity · 2025Article
- Digital data donations: A quest for best practices.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present PORT, a software platform for local data extraction and analysis of digital trace data. While digital trace data hold huge potential for social-scientific discovery, their most useful parts have been unattainable for scientists because of privacy concerns and prohibitive access to application programming interfaces. Recently, a workflow was introduced allowing citizens to donate their digital traces to scientists. In this workflow, citizens' digital traces are processed locally on their machines before providing informed consent to share a subset of the data with researchers. In this paper, we present the newly developed software PORT that implements the local processing part of this workflow, protecting privacy by shielding sensitive data from outside observers, including the researchers themselves. When using PORT, researchers can tailor the local processing procedure suitable to the data download package and research question. Thus, PORT enables a host of potential applications of social data science to hitherto unobtainable data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.