Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35510151›Full record

ArticleCritical care explorations2022

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score in the ICU As a Predictor of Long-Term Survival After Cardiac Surgery.

Tiago R Velho, Rafael Maniés Pereira, Tiago Paixão, Nuno Carvalho Guerra, Ricardo Ferreira, Hugo Corte-Real, Ângelo Nobre, Luís Ferreira Moita

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care explorations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Reply to Condello I.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tiago R VelhoCardiothoracic Surgery Department, Hospital de Santa Maria-CHLN, Lisboa, Portugal.
Rafael Maniés PereiraCardiothoracic Surgery Department, Hospital de Santa Maria-CHLN, Lisboa, Portugal.
Tiago PaixãoQuantitative and Digital Science Unit, Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.
Nuno Carvalho GuerraCardiothoracic Surgery Department, Hospital de Santa Maria-CHLN, Lisboa, Portugal.
Ricardo FerreiraCardiothoracic Surgery Department, Hospital de Santa Maria-CHLN, Lisboa, Portugal.
Hugo Corte-RealCardiothoracic Surgery Department, Hospital de Santa Maria-CHLN, Lisboa, Portugal.
Ângelo NobreCardiothoracic Surgery Department, Hospital de Santa Maria-CHLN, Lisboa, Portugal.
Luís Ferreira MoitaInnate Immunity and Inflammation Laboratory, Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.
Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is a predictor of mortality in ICU patients. Although it is widely used and has been validated as a reliable and independent predictor of mortality and morbidity in cardiac ICU, few studies correlate early postoperative SOFA with long-term survival.

designRetrospective observational cohort study.

settingTertiary academic cardiac surgery ICU. PATIENTS: One-thousand three-hundred seventy-nine patients submitted to cardiac surgery.

interventionsSOFA 24 hours, SOFA 48 hours, mean, and highest SOFA scores were correlated with survival at 12 and 24 months. Wilcoxon tests were used to analyze differences in variables. Multivariate logistic regressions and likelihood ratio test were used to access the predictive modeling. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess accuracy of the variables in separating survivor from nonsurvivors. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsLower SOFA scores have better survival rates at 12 and 24 months. Highest SOFA and SOFA at 48 hours showed to be better predictors of outcome and to have higher accuracy in distinguishing survivors from nonsurvivors than initial SOFA and mean SOFA. A decreasing score during the first 48 hours had mortality rates of 4.9%, while an unchanged or increased score was associated with a mortality rate of 5.7%.

conclusionsSOFA score in the ICU after cardiac surgery correlated with survival at 12 and 24 months. Patients with lower SOFA scores had higher survival rates. Differences in survival at 12 months were better correlated with the absolute value at 48 hours than with its variation. SOFA score may be useful to predict long-term outcomes and to stratify patients with higher probability of mortality.

Indexed as

cardiac surgeryintensive careorgan dysfunctionSequential Organ Failure Assessmentseverity score

Identifiers

PMID35510151
PMCPMC9061151
OpenAlexW4225130160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.