Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35510148›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2022

Management of Andersson lesions of spine: A systematic review of the existing literature.

P Venkata Sudhakar, Pankaj Kandwal, Kaustubh Ahuja Mch, Syed Ifthekar, Samarth Mittal, Bhaskar Sarkar

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Andersson-like lesion in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis; a rare diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

P Venkata SudhakarDept. of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Pankaj KandwalDept. of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Kaustubh Ahuja MchDept. of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Syed IfthekarDept. of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Samarth MittalDept. of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Bhaskar SarkarDepartment of Trauma Surgery, AIIMS Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Andersson lesions also termed as aseptic spondylodiscitis, spinal pseudoarthrosis are known to occur in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Trauma as well as inflammation has been cited as factors responsible for the causation of these lesions. A variety of surgical approaches have been described in the literature such as anterior, posterior, combined anterior and posterior, with or without reconstruction of the anterior column defect. Controversy still exists regarding the optimal management these lesions. Objective: To address the optimal method of management, levels of instrumentation, requirement of fusion and anterior instrumentation and general epidemiological profile of the patients with Andersson lesions. Materials and methods: An electronic search for studies on the surgical management of Andersson lesions of spine was performed. Quality assessment of the included articles was done by two independent authors according to the criteria used by researchers previously in systematic reviews. Results: Males were found to have an increased incidence with the thoracolumbar junction being the most common level. Posterior approach was the most favoured with reconstruction of the gap in the anterior column. Posterior osteotomy with correction of deformity was done commonly for an optimal healing environment. Instrumenting 2-3 levels above and below the lesion is favoured by most. Conclusion: Conservative management for Andersson lesions can be employed in the setting of acute trauma and stable fractures involving a single column. Surgical management of these lesions with a posterior long segment fixation and anterior column reconstruction is the favoured treatment in majority of the cases.

Indexed as

Andersson lesionAnkylosing spondylitisSpineSurgerySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35510148
PMCPMC9058944
OpenAlexW4224256724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.