Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35510130›Full record

ArticlePsychologica Belgica2022

The Role of Psychology in Media During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-National Study.

Angélica Caicedo-Moreno, Andrea Correa-Chica, Wilson López-López, Pablo Castro-Abril, Idaly Barreto, Juan Diego Rodriguez-Romero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychologica Belgica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Angélica Caicedo-MorenoUniversidad del País Vasco, Departamento de Psicología Social, ES.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2783-9522
Andrea Correa-ChicaUniversidad de Santiago de Compostela, Department of Social Psychology, Basic and Methodology, ES.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2936-5137
Wilson López-LópezPontificia Universidad Javeriana, Facultad de Psicología, CO.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2964-0402
Pablo Castro-AbrilUniversidad del País Vasco, Departamento de Psicología Social, ES.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9074-3921
Idaly BarretoUniversidad Católica de Colombia, Facultad de Psicología, ES.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3677-852X
Juan Diego Rodriguez-RomeroUniversidad de Santiago de Compostela, Department of Social Psychology, Basic and Methodology, ES.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5212-2478

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dealing with COVID-19 and with the preventative measures that have been taken to mitigate the transmission of the virus causing the pandemic has posed a great challenge to the population. While psychologists have expertise with regard to preventive behavior change and to dealing with the mental health impact of measures, their expertise needs to be effectively communicated to the public. Mass media play a critical role in times of crisis, in many cases being the only source of information. While most research focuses on the importance of information content as a factor affecting psychological responses to a collective traumatic event, the way information is framed in the media is likely to influence the way health professionals are perceived as trustworthy. This study aimed to analyze the media framing of information from psychology during the COVID-19 pandemic in six countries from America and Europe, identifying the most recurrent topics in the news (n news items = 541) related to psychology and mental health. In all six countries the media address the psychological needs of the population, which vary depending on the imposed restrictions. The news content is influenced by the scientific sources used by the media. While the most prevalent topics focus on psychological risk and the need to seek mental health care, the least prevalent topics relate to counseling and behavioral guidelines for managing the psychological consequences of the pandemic. The study findings provide insight into how psychological knowledge contributes to the understanding and mitigation of COVID-19 consequences in different countries and identified fields where psychologists were consulted to respond to a health emergency. They also show a preference to consult other experts when searching for contextual or more macro-social explanations of critical situation.

Indexed as

COVID-19Media, Topic ModelingPsychologyText Analysis

Identifiers

PMID35510130
PMCPMC9009363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.