Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35510129›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2022

Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Its Associated Factors Among Women Attending the Gynecology Outpatient Clinic at a Tertiary Hospital in Southwestern Uganda.

Rodgers Tugume, Henry Mark Lugobe, Paul Kalyebara Kato, Rogers Kajabwangu, Hamson Kanyesigye, Sezalio Masembe, Musa Kayondo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Pelvic Organ Prolapse and its Associated Factors Among Women: A Facility Based Cross-sectional Study.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rodgers TugumeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0001-6728-6312
Henry Mark LugobeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Paul Kalyebara KatoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Rogers KajabwanguDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-4101-011X
Hamson KanyesigyeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Sezalio MasembeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Musa KayondoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Mbarara University of Science and Technology · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the prevalence, clinical stage at presentation and factors associated with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) among women attending the gynecology outpatient clinic at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH), Uganda. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study at the gynecology outpatient clinic of MRRH from September 2019 to January 2020. Women aged 18-90 years were systematically sampled and recruited into this study. An interviewer administered questionnaire was used to collect participants' socio-demographic, obstetric, gynecological and medical factors. POP stage was obtained by using the pelvic organ prolapse-quantification system. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was done to determine factors associated with pelvic organ prolapse. Results: Of 338 participants enrolled, the prevalence of POP was 27.5% [n = 93, 95% Cl: 23.0-32.5]. POP stages were stage I 11.8% (n = 11), stage II 63.4% (n = 59), stage III 16.1% (n = 15) and stage IV 8.9% (n = 8). Grand-multiparity (aOR 17.1, 95% CI: 1.1-66.6), birth weight more than 3.5kg (aOR 3.7, 95% CI: 1.1-12.6), perineal tears (aOR 6.5, 95% CI: 2.1-20.2), peasant farmer (aOR 6.9, 95% CI: 1.6-29.9) and duration of labour in the first delivery >24 hours (aOR 5.7, 95% CI: 1.2-29) were significantly associated with POP. Conclusion: POP is common among women attending the gynecology clinic at MRRH with most of them presenting with stage II. There should be routine screening for POP to enable early identification and management especially in those who are grand multiparous, peasant farmers and have a history of perineal tears.

Indexed as

factors associatedpelvic organ prolapsepelvic organ prolapse quantification systemprevalencesouthwestern Uganda

Identifiers

PMID35510129
PMCPMC9060809
OpenAlexW4285742360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.