ArticleJournal of experimental pharmacology2022
Investigation of HPLF-111624 in Modified Experimental Models of Ulcerative Proctitis and Anal Fissure in Rats.
Article in Journal of experimental pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although ulcerative proctitis (UP) and anal fissure (AF) are common anorectal diseases, there are no appropriate experimental models to screen the drugs intended for these conditions. In this context, existing experimental models mimicking these diseases were modified and the polyherbal formulation, HPLF-111624 was evaluated in these models. Objective: To establish animal model for UP and AF and to evaluate polyherbal formulation, HPLF-111624 in these disease models. Methods: An experimental model of UP was selected based on the modification of the ulcerative colitis model using different concentrations of acetic acid. The concentration used for induction were 2.5%, 5% and 10% v/v and different weights used to induce AF were 25 g, 50 g and 100 g, which were selected based on the severity of inflammation, fecal score, gross pathology, and histopathological evaluation. Furthermore, these animal models were used to evaluate the efficacy of HPLF-111624, a polyherbal formulation known to be beneficial in anal diseases. Results: Acetic acid at 5% produced typical pathological changes that resembled UP, with a significant increase in the fecal score, gross lesion, and histopathological changes. Similarly, among the three weights, physical injury with a 100 g weight produced significant changes in the histopathological score in the model of AF. Intervention with HPLF-111624 at doses of 250 and 500 mg/kg b.wt., showed a reduction in the inflammatory cytokines and a significant improvement in the histopathological findings in both the conditions. Conclusion: The results showed that the modified experimental models for UP and AF resemble the human pathological conditions and are simple, versatile and may be used for screening drugs intended for these conditions. Intervention with HPLF-111624 was found to be effective in improving the pathological state of UP and AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.