Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35509875›Full record

ReviewMedical acupuncture2022

Effectiveness of Acupuncture for Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Hitomi Asano, Derek Plonka, Jacqueline Weeger

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical acupuncture, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hitomi AsanoEmperor's College of Traditional Oriental Medicine, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Derek PlonkaEmperor's College of Traditional Oriental Medicine, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Jacqueline WeegerUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Emperors College · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis assess the effectiveness of acupuncture as an adjunct to standard therapy in the management of nonspecific chronic low back pain (NScLBP), compared with standard therapy alone. Methods: A systematic literature search of full-text articles of randomized controlled trials in the date range of 2000-2020, utilizing PubMed and EBSCO databases, was performed to evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture treatment for nonspecific chronic lower back pain. The outcomes of interest were pain intensity and disability. The methodological quality of each study was evaluated using Cochrane risk-of-bias criteria. The studies were combined using meta-analysis when statistical pooling of data was possible. Results: This systematic review included 5 studies of which 4 were included in the meta-analysis. Acupuncture as an adjunct to standard therapy had clinically meaningful reduction in self-reported pain at post-treatment (mean difference = -1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI), -1.59 to -0.49], Conclusion: Both the systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate that acupuncture as an adjunct to standard therapy is a safe and effective method in reducing pain and disability among adults with NScLBP.

Indexed as

acupuncturechronic low back painelectroacupuncturenonspecific low back pain

Identifiers

PMID35509875
PMCPMC9057891
OpenAlexW4225948341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.