ArticleMedical acupuncture2022
Acupuncture for Pediatrics: An Educational Initiative.
Article in Medical acupuncture, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: With the ongoing opioid crisis, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends nonpharmacologic therapies (e.g., acupuncture) for treating pain. Multiple agencies, such as the National Institutes of Health and World Health Organization, recognize acupuncture's effectiveness for treating pain, but acupuncture education for providers is scarce. A Workshop to Introduce Acupuncture for Pediatrics (AcuPeds-Workshop) was developed with support from American Academy of Pediatrics to educate providers. Additional funding was given by the Virginia Apgar Academy to evaluate the effects of attending this workshop. Materials and Methods: This prospective study used Immediate and 1-Month Post-Workshop (PWS) surveys. The AcuPeds-Workshop components included: history; a literature review; videos of patients receiving acupuncture; and hands-on experience. The workshop was presented at numerous conferences. Attendee survey completion was voluntary. Results: Of 327 attendees, the majority were female, non-Hispanic, and were physicians. At baseline, attendees had: heard of acupuncture, 96%; used it, 28%; and/or had a prior lecture, 13%. In the Immediate-PWS: 97% reported an increase in their knowledge and understanding of the indications for acupuncture; majority correctly addressed 3 clinical application scenarios and contraindications. With respect to attitude: 85% would use acupuncture for themselves and 88% would use it for patients. More than 80% rated the workshop components as useful or very useful. In the One-Month-PWS: majority addressed the same 3 clinical scenarios and contraindications correctly, and 11% considered referring patients for acupuncture. Conclusions: Attendance at this AcuPeds-Workshop had a positive impact on attendees' knowledge, application of, and attitude about acupuncture. This workshop supports efforts to educate medical providers on this nonpharmacologic pain therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.