Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35509774›Full record

ArticleIJU case reports2022

Robot-assisted radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy: Initial experience in Japan.

Daisuke Motoyama, Toshiki Ito, Takayuki Sugiyama, Atsushi Otsuka, Hideaki Miyake

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in IJU case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daisuke MotoyamaDepartment of Urology Hamamatsu University School of Medicine Hamamatsu Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5315-3874
Toshiki ItoDepartment of Urology Hamamatsu University School of Medicine Hamamatsu Japan.
Takayuki SugiyamaDepartment of Urology Hamamatsu University School of Medicine Hamamatsu Japan.
Atsushi OtsukaDepartment of Urology Hamamatsu University School of Medicine Hamamatsu Japan.
Hideaki MiyakeDepartment of Urology Hamamatsu University School of Medicine Hamamatsu Japan.
Hamamatsu University School of Medicine · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Open surgical approach remains the standard treatment for renal cell carcinoma with an inferior vena cava tumor thrombus. In recent years, however, robot-assisted radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy have emerged as minimally invasive alternatives to conventional open surgery. Case presentation: Here, we describe a 76-year-old female patient with right renal cell carcinoma with a level I inferior vena cava thrombus undergoing robot-assisted radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy, which was successfully completed with a purely robotic procedure, resulting in the following outcomes: console time,167 min; total operative time, 211 min; and estimated blood loss, 150 mL. To our knowledge, this is the first case managed by robot-assisted radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy in Japan. Conclusion: Based on our experience, it might be worthwhile to consider purely robotic surgery for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma with an inferior vena cava thrombus.

Indexed as

inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomyrenal cell carcinomarobot‐assisted radical nephrectomy

Identifiers

PMID35509774
PMCPMC9057738
OpenAlexW4210357310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.