Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35509708›Full record

Trial reportBioMed research international2022

Comparison of rhBMP-2 in Combination with Different Biomaterials for Regeneration in Rat Calvaria Critical-Size Defects.

Francisca Uribe, Bélgica Vásquez, Juan Pablo Alister, Sergio Olate

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francisca UribeMedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1341-4005
Bélgica VásquezFaculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Tarapacá, Arica, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4106-3548
Juan Pablo AlisterDivision of Oral, Facial and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
Sergio OlateDivision of Oral, Facial and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8153-0676
Universidad de La Frontera · CLUniversity of Tarapacá · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regeneration of critical bone defects requires the use of biomaterials. The incorporation of osteoinductive agents, such as bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), improves bone formation. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of rhBMP-2 in combination with different materials for bone regeneration in critical-sized rat calvarial defects. This was an experimental animal study using 30 rats. In each rat, two 5-mm critical-size defects were made in the calvaria (60 bone defects in total) using a trephine. All rats were randomized to one of the six groups: control (C), autograft + rhBMP-2 (A), absorbable collagen sponge + rhBMP-2 (ACS),

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsBone Morphogenetic Protein 2AnimalsBone Morphogenetic ProteinsBone RegenerationCattleCollagenHumansOsteogenesisRatsRecombinant ProteinsSkullTransforming Growth Factor betaBiocompatible MaterialsBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Bone Morphogenetic ProteinsCollagenRecombinant ProteinsTransforming Growth Factor beta

Identifiers

PMID35509708
PMCPMC9061001
OpenAlexW4285684949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.