ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022
Rules of Chinese Herbal Intervention of Radiation Pneumonia Based on Network Pharmacology and Data Mining.
Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hydrogen-rich solution alleviates acute radiation pneumonitis by regulating oxidative stress and macrophages polarization.Journal of radiation research · 2024Article
- A systematic study on the treatment of hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma with drugs based on bioinformatics and key target reverse network pharmacology and experimental verification.Infectious agents and cancer · 2023Article
- Insights into the Anti-inflammatory and Antiviral Mechanisms of Resveratrol.Mediators of inflammation · 2022Review
- A systematic study of traditional Chinese medicine treating hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma based on target-driven reverse network pharmacology.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the mechanism and principles of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in the management of radiation pneumonia. Methods: The targets of radiation pneumonia were obtained by screening the GeneCards, OMIM, TTD, DrugBank, and HERB databases, analyzing ADME parameters. In addition, compounds and Chinese herbs that can act on the targets were screened from the TCMSP database. The core target compounds for TCM were used to construct the target-compound, compound-traditional Chinese medicine, and target-compound-traditional Chinese medicine networks. These networks were further used to select the core targets, compounds, and TCM. The binding strength between the core targets and compounds was determined using AutoDock Vina. The trajectory for the molecular dynamics simulation was completed by Desmond version 2020. Results: A total of 55 active targets in radiation pneumonia were identified. Subsequently, 137 candidate compounds and 469 Chinese herbs were matched. Frequency statistics showed that the Chinese herbs that could interfere with radiation pneumonia were mainly bitter, spicy, and sweet, with both cold and warm properties. Moreover, they mainly belonged to liver and lung channels. The core targets included TNF, IL-6, TGF- Conclusion: Using network pharmacology, we explored the potential mechanism of TCM in the treatment of radiation pneumonia. The general rules for application of TCM in the treatment of radiation pneumonia were summarized. This study provides baseline information for future research on the development of TCM for the management of radiation pneumonia.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.