Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35509622›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2022

Radiofrequency Ablation for the Knee Joint: A Survey by the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience.

Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Natalie Strand, Karina Gritsenko, Joshua Martens, Krishnan Chakravarthy, Dawood Sayed, Timothy Deer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Alaa Abd-ElsayedUniversity of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Anesthesiology, Madison, WI, USA.
Natalie StrandDivision of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9489-2550
Karina GritsenkoMontefiore Multidisciplinary Pain Program, Bronx, NY, USA.
Joshua MartensUniversity of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Anesthesiology, Madison, WI, USA.
Krishnan ChakravarthyUniversity of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Dawood SayedUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8867-2140
Timothy DeerThe Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USMontefiore Medical Center · USThe Spine & Nerve Centers of the Virginias · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · USWinnMed · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective, minimally invasive procedure often used to treat patients with intractable knee pain secondary to knee osteoarthritis and failed knee replacements. The prevalence of knee pain in adults has been estimated to be as high as 40% and is continuously increasing with an aging population. Over the past two decades, proceduralists have adopted variations in patient preparation, procedural steps, and post-operative care for genicular nerve RFA procedures. A survey was dispensed via the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) to gain a popular assessment of common practices for genicular nerve RFA. Methods: A 29 question survey was dispensed via SurveyMonkey to all members of ASPN. Members were able to respond to the survey a single time and were unable to make changes to their responses once the survey was submitted. After responses were compiled, each question was assessed in order to determine common practices for genicular nerve RFA. Results: A total of 378 proceduralists responded to the survey. There was high consensus with the three most commonly targeted nerves. The inferomedial, superomedial, and superolateral genicular branches were treated by 95-96% of respondents, while other targets were less commonly treated. There remains some debate among proceduralists regarding the need for a second diagnostic nerve block and the type of steroid used for diagnostic nerve blocks. Conclusion: Pain physicians use a wide variety of methods to perform genicular nerve ablations. The data offered by the survey show that there is no standardized protocol when it comes to treating knee pain via genicular nerve block and ablation and highlights controversies among proceduralists that ought to serve as the targets of future clinical research aimed at establishing a standardized protocol.

Indexed as

genicular nerve ablationgenicular nerve blockgenicular nerve surveyknee radiofrequency ablationradiofrequency ablation

Identifiers

PMID35509622
PMCPMC9057892
OpenAlexW4224939592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.