ReviewSurgical neurology international2022
Unruptured cerebral aneurysm risk stratification: Background, current research, and future directions in aneurysm assessment.
Review in Surgical neurology international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel Morphological Classification of Intracranial Aneurysm Wall Irregularity Associates Specific Features with Increased Size and Rupture Risk: A Retrospective Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study.Neurology international · 2026Article
- Ring-like (Donut-Shaped) Intracranial Aneurysms: A Warning Morphology of Mural Jet Flow and Pre-Rupture Instability.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Design and Optimization of a Tapered Magnetic Soft Continuum Robot for Enhanced Navigation in Cerebral Vasculature.Micromachines · 2025Article
- Dynamic changes of MMPs during cerebral aneurysm formation in rats and the effect of resveratrol on MMP expression.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The optimal management of unruptured cerebral aneurysms is widely debated in the medical field. Rapid technology advances, evolving understanding of underlying pathophysiology, and shifting practice patterns have made the cerebrovascular field particularly dynamic in recent years. Despite progress, there remains a dearth of large randomized studies to help guide the management of these controversial patients. Methods: We review the existing literature on the natural history of unruptured cerebral aneurysms and highlight ongoing research aimed at improving our ability to stratify risk in these patients. Results: Landmark natural history studies demonstrated the significance of size, location, and other risk factors for aneurysm rupture, but prior studies have significant limitations. We have begun to understand the underlying pathophysiology behind aneurysm formation and rupture and are now applying new tools such as flow dynamics simulations and machine learning to individualize rupture risk stratification. Conclusion: Prior studies have identified several key risk factors for aneurysmal rupture, but have limitations. New technology and research methods have enabled us to better understanding individual rupture risk for patients with unruptured cerebral aneurysms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.