Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35509514›Full record

ArticleJournal of exercise science and fitness2022

Comparison of VO

Corey Selland, Matthew D Vukovich, Jessica R Meendering

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of exercise science and fitness, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparison of Cardiorespiratory Fitness Testing Measures in Children.International journal of exercise science · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Corey SellandDepartment of Human Performance, Minnesota State University, Mankato, MN, USA.
Matthew D VukovichDepartment of Health and Nutritional Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, USA.
Jessica R MeenderingDepartment of Health and Nutritional Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in peak oxygen consumption (VO Methods: Forty-four participants (25 boys, 19 girls) had VO Results: The PACER elicited a greater measured VO Conclusions: The PACER provides an acceptable measure of cardiorespiratory fitness in children but the finding that children elicit a higher measured VO

Indexed as

AdolescentCardiorespiratory fitnessChildExercise testPhysical fitness

Identifiers

PMID35509514
PMCPMC9042897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.