Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35509503›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)2022

A cohort study of the impact of COVID-19 on the quality of life of people newly diagnosed with dementia and their family carers.

Ben Hicks, Sanna Read, Bo Hu, Raphael Wittenberg, Amanda Grahamslaw, Anomita Karim, Evelyn Martin, Eleanor Nuzum, Jacob Reichental, Alice Russell and 19 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The risk of developing dementia in the COVID-19 pandemic; a cohort study.International journal of geriatric psychiatry · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Ben HicksBrighton and Sussex Medical School University of Sussex Brighton UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6445-2415
Sanna ReadCare Policy and Evaluation Centre London School of Economics and Political Science London UK.
Bo HuCare Policy and Evaluation Centre London School of Economics and Political Science London UK.
Raphael WittenbergCare Policy and Evaluation Centre London School of Economics and Political Science London UK.
Amanda GrahamslawGateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust Gateshead UK.
Anomita KarimSussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust Worthing UK.
Evelyn MartinSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust London UK.
Eleanor NuzumSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust London UK.
Jacob ReichentalSussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust Worthing UK.
Alice RussellSussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust Worthing UK.
Elaine SiddleGateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust Gateshead UK.
Bryony StoreyGateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust Gateshead UK.
Eva TippingSussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust Worthing UK.
Kate BaxterSocial Policy Research Unit University of York York UK.
Yvonne BirksSocial Policy Research Unit University of York York UK.
Carol BrayneCambridge Public Health University of Cambridge Cambridge UK.
Nicola BrimblecombeCare Policy and Evaluation Centre London School of Economics and Political Science London UK.
Margaret DangoorCare Policy and Evaluation Centre London School of Economics and Political Science London UK.
Josie DixonCare Policy and Evaluation Centre London School of Economics and Political Science London UK.
Kate GridleySocial Policy Research Unit University of York York UK.
Peter R HarrisSchool of Psychology University of Sussex Brighton UK.
Martin KnappCare Policy and Evaluation Centre London School of Economics and Political Science London UK.
Eleanor MilesSchool of Psychology University of Sussex Brighton UK.
Rotem PerachSchool of Psychology University of Sussex Brighton UK.
Louise RobinsonPopulation Health Sciences Institute Newcastle University Newcastle UK.
Jennifer RustedSchool of Psychology University of Sussex Brighton UK.
Rob StewartInstitute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London UK.
Alan J ThomasInstitute for Ageing Newcastle University Newcastle UK.
Sube BanerjeeFaculty of Health University of Plymouth Plymouth UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: COVID-19 has impacted people with dementia and their family carers, yet little is known about effects on overall quality of life. Methods: In a UK cohort study, pre- and post-pandemic data were collected from 114 carers and 93 recently diagnosed people with dementia. Latent growth curve modeling examined change in quality of life. Results: Carers reported significant decline in quality of life, although no change was demonstrated by people with dementia. In multivariable analyses, higher levels of cognitive impairment, deprivation, study site, and lower number of memory clinic contacts were associated with greater decline in carer quality of life. Discussion: Maintaining life quality for people with dementia during the pandemic appears to have come at the expense of their family carers. This inequity has fallen hardest on those caring for people with more severe dementia, in deprived areas, and with least support from memory services. These effects may be prevented or reversed by post-diagnostic care.

Indexed as

cohort studyCOVID‐19dementiainequalitiesinequitiespost‐diagnostic carequality of life

Identifiers

PMID35509503
PMCPMC9060551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.