ArticleEpilepsy & behavior reports2022
Rituximab in Rasmussen's encephalitis: A single center experience and review of the literature.
Article in Epilepsy & behavior reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice-Evidence-Based Approach From the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Tenth Special Issue.Journal of clinical apheresis · 2026Guideline
- Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Strategies in Epilepsy: From Molecular Mechanisms to Threshold Management.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- International consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of Rasmussen syndrome: A modified Delphi procedure.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Immune landscape of the affected brain in Rasmussen encephalitis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Clinical spectrum, diagnosis, cognitive outcomes and therapeutic strategies in pediatric Rasmussen syndrome: a 10-year cohort from a tertiary pediatric center.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- The role of early immunotherapy in rasmussen's encephalitis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Atypical Rasmussen's Encephalitis.Cureus · 2023Article
- A Special Case of Relapsing-Remitting Bilateral Encephalitis: Without Epilepsy, but Responding to Rituximab and with a Brain Biopsy Coinciding with Rasmussen Encephalitis.Brain sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rasmussen's encephalitis (RE) is a rare chronic inflammatory disease of the brain resulting in unilateral hemispheric atrophy with drug-resistant focal epilepsy associated with a variable degree of progressive hemiparesis and cognitive decline. The precise etiology of RE is unknown but presumed to have a neuroinflammatory pathobiological basis. Only surgery halts progression of the disease, but may occur at the expense of a fixed but otherwise inevitable neurological deficit. Therefore, the question of medical management is an important consideration. Reports of rituximab use in patients with RE were presented at the American Epilepsy Society annual meeting in 2008. Good published evidence for its usage has been very slow to emerge since then. However, rituximab continues to be listed in discussions of treatment options for patients with RE, though other monoclonal antibodies have since been used with comparable outcomes. We describe a series of nine patients including two with adult-onset RE. Rituximab was used early in the disease course (range 1-108 months; mean 32 months). Of nine patients with RE, there was significant benefit in their seizure burden with rituxamab. Seizure freedom occurred in 3 patients. Epilepsia partialis continua (EPC) was present in 4/9 and no focal motor deficit noted in 4/9. No progression of a neurological deficit was present in 2/9 and evidence of progression with neuroimaging was terminated with rituxamab in 5/9 supporting early use of rituxamab in patients with RE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.