Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35509478›Full record

ArticleAsian journal of urology2022

Impact of delay from transperineal biopsy to radical prostatectomy upon objective measures of cancer control.

Liang G Qu, Gregory Jack, Marlon Perera, Melanie Evans, Sue Evans, Damien Bolton, Nathan Papa

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Liang G QuDepartment of Urology, Olivia Newton John Cancer Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg VIC, Australia.
Gregory JackDepartment of Urology, Olivia Newton John Cancer Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg VIC, Australia.
Marlon PereraDepartment of Urology, Olivia Newton John Cancer Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg VIC, Australia.
Melanie EvansDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne VIC, Australia.
Sue EvansDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne VIC, Australia.
Damien BoltonDepartment of Urology, Olivia Newton John Cancer Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg VIC, Australia.
Nathan PapaDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne VIC, Australia.
Monash University · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AUAustin Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Treatment delays in prostate cancer have been characterised, although not explicitly in men undergoing transperineal prostate biopsies. We aimed to determine if delays to radical prostatectomy correlate with adverse outcomes using a contemporary population-based cohort of men diagnosed by transperineal biopsies. Methods: This study analysed men with prostate cancer of the International Society for Urological Pathology grade group ≥2, diagnosed by transperineal prostate biopsies who underwent prostatectomy, using the prospectively data from 1 January 2014 to 30 June 2018 Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry-Victoria. Data were analysed according to stratified demographic and disease characteristics. Time intervals from biopsy (28, 60, 90, 120, and 270 days) were compared using odds ratios and regression analyses for proportion of upgrading, early biochemical recurrence, pT3 disease at prostatectomy, and positive surgical margins. Results: In total, 2008 men were analysed. There were 306 (16.7%) men with upgrading, 151 (8.4%) with biochemical recurrence, 1068 (54.1%) with pT3 disease, and 464 (23.1%) with positive surgical margins (percentages excluded patients with missing data). All adverse outcomes studied were significantly associated with higher prostate-specific antigen and grade at diagnosis. Delays of 120-270 days did not adversely alter the incidence of Gleason upgrading, pT3, or recurrence. Delays (most frequent 60-89 days, 28%) were associated with positive surgical margins but not monotonically. Regression modelling demonstrated no increased likelihood of most adverse outcomes for up to 270 days. Conclusion: Men with prostate cancer of grade group ≥2 diagnosed through transperineal biopsy may wait up to 270 days for a prostatectomy without a greater likelihood of upgrading, pT3 disease, positive surgical margins, or biochemical recurrence.

Indexed as

BiopsyDisease progressionProstate cancerRecurrenceTreatment delay

Identifiers

PMID35509478
PMCPMC9051344
OpenAlexW3200988681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.