Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35509444›Full record

ArticleRehabilitation research and practice2022

Effectiveness of a Soft Robotic Glove to Assist Hand Function in Stroke Patients: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.

Wachirayongyot Thimabut, Pim Terachinda, Wasuwat Kitisomprayoonkul

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rehabilitation research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07287059 (Effects of Wearable Robotic and Virtual Reality-Assisted Interventions on Hand Function in Stroke Rehabilitation), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07287059 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Wearable Robotic and Virtual Reality-Assisted Interventions on Hand Function in Stroke Rehabilitation

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedipol UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled42ConditionsPost-Stroke HemiplegiaArmsSoft Robotic Glove (SRG), Leap Motion Controller (LMC), Neurodevelopmental Therapy (NDT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wachirayongyot ThimabutInternational Program in Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3834-8200
Pim TerachindaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4745-0247
Wasuwat KitisomprayoonkulDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8432-9521

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Stroke patients have difficulty performing tasks using their paretic hands. There are limited data on the effects of using a soft robotic glove to assist with hand function. The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a soft robotic glove in assisting hand function in stroke patients. Methods: This study was a cross-sectional pilot study. Twenty stroke patients with partial or complete hand weakness were recruited from a rehabilitation centre. The Box and Block Test (BBT) and the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) were performed under two conditions: with and without use of the soft robotic glove. The order of the conditions was randomly assigned by a computer-generated program. Results: BBT scores increased 6.4 blocks when using the soft robotic glove ( Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that using a soft robotic glove can assist a poststroke paretic hand in executing grasp, grip, and pinch.

Identifiers

PMID35509444
PMCPMC9061070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.