Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35509409›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2022

Genetic screening to avoid adverse drug reactions from medication use and approach patients' better outcomes: A lesson learn from the report of the Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital.

Kessada Tunwongsa, Malinee Chonnawakul, Nopavut Geratikornsupuk, Karunrat Tewthanom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kessada TunwongsaDepartment of Pharmacy Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital Chonburi Thailand.
Malinee ChonnawakulDepartment of Pharmacy Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital Chonburi Thailand.
Nopavut GeratikornsupukDepartment of Medicine Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital Chonburi Thailand.
Karunrat TewthanomDepartment of Pharmacy Silpakorn University Nakhon Pathum Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-8496-3848

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique is adopted for pharmacogenetic testing and adverse drug reaction (ADR) analysis. Methods: PCR was used for testing of pharmacogenetic markers for HLA and non-HLA polymorphism related to specific drugs. Results: Among 76 cases that underwent genetic screening, 7.7%, 11.1%, and 2.7% of the patients were found to be genetically positive for allopurinol, carbamazepine, and abacavir, respectively. Two cases were genetically positive for interferon, and two cases of extensive metabolizers were positive for clopidogrel. One case of a NAT2 slow acetylator for isoniazid was found. Among the 74 cases with complete outcomes, 39.2% showed improvements and 18.9% reported a deterioration. Although no serious ADR was observed, two HLA-B*5701-negative cases reported ADRs (2.7%). All patients positive for IL28B were improved. One patient receiving clopidogrel showed improvements, but another showed deterioration. Finally, the outcome of slow acetylation NAT2 was worse without ADR. Conclusion: PCR-based pharmacogenetic testing is critical for ADR monitoring in a cost-effective manner.

Indexed as

adverse drug reactiongenetics screeninglesson to learnmedication use

Identifiers

PMID35509409
PMCPMC9059221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.