Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35509390›Full record

ReviewHealth science reports2022

Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of adverse outcome in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: A systematic review.

Sandip Kuikel, Nibesh Pathak, Sagar Poudel, Sital Thapa, Shiva Lal Bhattarai, Gajendra Chaudhary, Kundan Raj Pandey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health science reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Role of Systemic Inflammatory Markers in the Differential Diagnosis of Organizing Pneumonia and Lung Cancer.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sandip KuikelMaharajgunj Medical Campus Tribhuvan University Institute of Medicine Kathmandu Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-7891-0333
Nibesh PathakMaharajgunj Medical Campus Tribhuvan University Institute of Medicine Kathmandu Nepal.
Sagar PoudelMaharajgunj Medical Campus Tribhuvan University Institute of Medicine Kathmandu Nepal.
Sital ThapaMaharajgunj Medical Campus Tribhuvan University Institute of Medicine Kathmandu Nepal.ORCID 0000-0001-6425-9490
Shiva Lal BhattaraiMaharajgunj Medical Campus Tribhuvan University Institute of Medicine Kathmandu Nepal.
Gajendra ChaudharyMaharajgunj Medical Campus Tribhuvan University Institute of Medicine Kathmandu Nepal.
Kundan Raj PandeyDepartment of Internal Medicine Tribhuvan University Institute of Medicine Kathmandu Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is the acute infection of lung tissue in an immunocompetent who acquired it from the community. Its incidence and mortality are significant and require a marker to predict the severity and mortality in these patients. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a simple, cheap, and easy-to-use marker and this study describes its role in predicting the adverse outcome in patients with CAP. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were used to search for related studies on February 8, 2021. A total of 186 articles were retrieved upon detailed searching in the databases and search engines. After a series of removing duplicate articles, title and abstract screening, and full-text review; nine articles were found eligible and included in the study. The data from each article were collected in MS Excel and the findings were summarized in this manuscript. Results: The total number of patients analyzed in this systematic review is 3340. The mean age of the patient in the included studies ranged from 61 to 90.4 years. All studies had adverse outcomes as the endpoint of the study, which included in-hospital mortality or intensive care unit (ICU) admission or deterioration from medium and low risk to high risk or 30 days' mortality. The prevalence of endpoint ranged from 5.8% to 44.8%. NLR with a cutoff value of more than 10 was shown to predict mortality compared to C-reactive protein levels, white blood cell count, neutrophil count, lymphocyte level, Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) level, PSI class, procalcitonin, and CURB-65 (Confusion, Respiratory rate, Blood pressure, 65 years of age and older) in most of the studies. Conclusion: NLR is a simple, easily measured yet promising marker for predicting outcomes in patients with CAP.

Indexed as

adverse outcomeCAPNLRpneumoniapredictor

Identifiers

PMID35509390
PMCPMC9060320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.