ReviewHealth science reports2022
Scientific research competitiveness in hospitals: A narrative review of major hospital ranking systems in China.
Review in Health science reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Invisible conflicts: the impact of covert academic bullying among "Double First-Class" young medical teachers on academic output-a qualitative study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Measuring Psychological Strains: A Psychometric Study to Develop a Shortened Version of the Psychological Strain Scales.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Formulation of a CITE metric for evaluating the clinical implications of medical studies and their originating hospitals in China.Health care science · 2024Article
- Constructing an effective evaluation system to identify doctors' research capabilities.Health care science · 2024Article
- Model for managing scientific research in a public hospital: case study: Chilean National Cancer Institute, from 2015-2022.Ecancermedicalscience · 2024Article
- Exploring the role of ranking systems towards university performance improvement: A focus group-based study.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Article
- Factors affecting the scientific research ability and the corresponding countermeasures in clinical postgraduates.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Chinese healthcare organizations' innovative performance in the digital health era.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Scientific research competitiveness in hospitals: A narrative review of major hospital ranking systems in China.Health science reports · 2022Review
- Artificial intelligence-based internet hospital pharmacy services in China: Perspective based on a case study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Several hospital ranking systems have been created in China recently, but there is still a lack of comprehensive analysis of the weight and significance of scientific research in hospital ranking. The present study aimed to identify and analyze the role of scientific research competitiveness in various hospital ranking systems in China. Methods: Over 200 materials published between 2010 and 2020 and related to three mainstream hospital ranking systems in China were reviewed. The methodologies applied in the three ranking systems were analyzed and compared. In addition, the comparative learning and analysis of Top 10 and Top 46-55 hospitals according to the ranking system of China's Best Hospital Rankings was performed for a longitudinal study. Results: The three major hospital rankings had different scientific research capability ranking methodologies and emphases of scientific research evaluation systems. The most commonly used indicators were science citation index (SCI) publications, National Scientific Foundation of China funding, a number of national key laboratories, and a number of academicians. The relative standing of several top hospitals showed slightly different in the three major Chinese hospital ranking systems. For the longitudinal study, we found that the fluctuation of the ranking of the Top 46-55 hospitals was significantly higher than that of the Top 10 hospitals, in which scientific research played a vital role. Conclusion: The proportion of scientific research plays an important role in the hospital ranking systems. The quality and quantity of SCI publications, the key indicators of national projects, and top academic talents are the most important factors used to evaluate the level of hospital scientific research, and thus affect the ranking of hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.