ArticleHealth science reports2022
Counseling and prenatal diagnosis in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: A retrospective study on a 13-year multidisciplinary approach.
Article in Health science reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Psychological Burden of Neuromuscular Diseases: A Narrative Review of Anxiety, Depression, Coping, and Quality of Life.Muscles (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The distribution of D4Z4 repeats in China and direct prenatal diagnosis of FSHD by optical genome mapping.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Review
- Deciphering the Complexity of FSHD: A Multimodal Approach as a Model for Rare Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- De novo variants and recombination at 4q35: Hints for preimplantation genetic testing in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.Clinical genetics · 2023Article
- Counseling and prenatal diagnosis in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: A retrospective study on a 13-year multidisciplinary approach.Health science reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: This is the first national population-based report about prenatal diagnosis for families with a history of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), a complex hereditary disease. The incomplete disease penetrance and the phenotypic heterogeneity observed in carriers of D4Z4 alleles of reduced size, the FSHD molecular hallmark, make the estimate of genetic risk problematic. Methods: We considered all requests of preconception counseling and prenatal diagnosis received between January 2008 and December 2020 by the genetic counseling service associated with the Italian National Registry for FSHD (INRF). A multidisciplinary team managed the clinical and molecular data of each family. Results: Between 2008 and 2020, 60 couples required preconception counseling (PC) for FSHD. In 52 couples was observed at least one partner carried a D4Z4 reduced allele (DRA). Out of these 52 couples, 47 had a follow-up visit routine yearly. Out of these 47, 26 (55.3%) couples had children: eight asked for prenatal diagnosis (PND), two had assisted reproduction by heterologous in vitro fertilization (IVF), and 16 did not require further assistance. Regarding PND, 50 prenatal analyses were performed for 36 couples. The test resulted positive in 27 pregnancies, 12 (44.4%) were terminated, and 15 (55.6%) were carried to term. Conclusion: The different choices made by the couples show the importance of an integrated approach to support genetic counseling for FSHD. These results remark the relevance of the clinical and molecular investigation of the extended family, preferably before conception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.