ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2022
Busulfan Treatment for Myeloproliferative Disease may Reduce Injection Burden in Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Driven Retinopathy.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Discovering Root Causal Genes with High Throughput Perturbations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Screening for urinary markers predicting hematopoietic stem cell injury induced by busulfan using genetically diverse mice.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) have been associated with increased systemic levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). This study investigated an association between systemic busulfan for treatment of MPN and the requirement for intravitreal anti-VEGF injections for treatment of retinal pathology. Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients receiving systemic busulfan for myeloproliferative neoplasm and intravitreal anti-VEGF injections for macular and retinal vascular diseases from 2007 to 2021. Results: Of seven patients receiving oral busulfan for a hematological neoplasm and having concomitant retinal pathology requiring intravitreal anti-VEGF, all were white females >60 years old with MPN and exudative age-related macular degeneration. Of these, two patients had a reduced anti-VEGF requirement while on systemic busulfan, two took busulfan for fewer than 5 months, one developed retinal pathology over one year after stopping busulfan, one developed new retinal pathology while taking busulfan, and one had limited follow-up. Of the two patients with reduced anti-VEGF requirement while taking systemic busulfan, both had JAK2 V617F mutated MPN, and subsequent busulfan discontinuation was associated with an increased requirement for intravitreal anti-VEGF injections. Conclusions and importance: Systemic busulfan for treatment of MPN was associated with a reduced requirement for intravitreal anti-VEGF injections for retinal vascular disease in two patients. This association could be a result of inhibition of proliferative angiogenesis or reduced systemic VEGF levels with effective systemic treatment for MPN. Further study is required to confirm this association and determine whether this relationship is specific to busulfan or extends to other systemic medications used to treat MPN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.