Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35509073›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2022

Comparison of canine owner profile according to food choice: an online preliminary survey in France.

S Hoummady, M Fantinati, D Maso, A Bynens, D Banuls, N R Santos, M Roche, N Priymenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. No evidence of multidrug-resistantMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

S HoummadyUniversité Paris-Est, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, UMES, 7 avenue du Général de Gaulle, 94704, Maisons-Alfort, France. sa.hoummady@gmail.com.
M FantinatiÉcole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, 23 chemin des Capelles, 31300, Toulouse, France.
D MasoUniversité Paris-Est, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, CHUVA, 7 avenue du Général de Gaulle, 94704, Maisons-Alfort, France.
A BynensFACCO, 46 Boulevard de Magenta, 75010, Paris, France.
D BanulsÉcole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, 23 chemin des Capelles, 31300, Toulouse, France.
N R SantosUniversité Paris-Est, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, CHUVA, 7 avenue du Général de Gaulle, 94704, Maisons-Alfort, France.
M RocheÉcole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, 23 chemin des Capelles, 31300, Toulouse, France.
N PriymenkoTOXALIM, Université de Toulouse, Institut National de La Recherche Agronomique (INRA), École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse (ENVT), BP 87614, 23 chemin des Capelles, 31076, Toulouse cedex, France.

Funding

Facco (Fédération des fabricant d'aliments pour chiens, chats, oiseaux et autres animaux familiers Facco (Fédération des fabricant d'aliments pour chiens, chats, oiseaux et autres animaux familiers
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNowadays, more people are treating dogs as family members. This reflects their increased attention towards their nutrition, with renewed interest for non-conventional diets such as Biologically Appropriate Raw Food/ Bones and Raw Food in United States (BARF) or homemade. In previous studies, owners feeding their dog non-conventional diets reported lower levels of trust in veterinary advice. The aim of the study was to identify differences in lifestyle between owners feeding dogs non-conventional diets and those feeding conventional diets (i.e., dry/wet pet food) to give further insight for improving communication between veterinarians and owners.

resultsA total of 426 surveys were usable. Fifteen percent of the participants lived in the metropole of Paris and had more than one dog (mean 1.72 dogs). Thirty-eight percent of the survey respondents stated that their dogs were fed exclusively with non-conventional diets, while 55% declared using conventional diets alone (not considering treats). The study canine population was for the most part neutered (63%) and purebred (68%). Amongst owners feeding conventional diets exclusively, 47% determined how much food to feed by consulting the feeding guidelines on the packaging, and only 28% said that the amount of food was prescribed by their veterinarian or veterinary nurse. Out of the participants feeding non-conventional diets, 65% declared that the information for formulating the recipes was gathered on the internet or in non-veterinary books. When compared with owners feeding exclusively conventional diets, those feeding non-conventional diets were living more frequently outside the metropole of Paris, had fewer children (0.23 ± 0.57 vs 0.37 ± 0.78; p = 0.03) and had more frequently other animals. They also dewormed less often their pets, walked their dog more each day (91 vs 78%; p < 0.001) and without leash for more than 6 h per week (46 vs 31%; p = 0.003).

conclusionsThis survey described differences in the habits of owners feeding dogs non-conventional diets in comparison with those feeding conventional diets. Data suggest that owners using non-conventional diets may be more attentive to the ethological needs of their dog which could be a starting point for practitioners for achieving better client-veterinarian communication.

Indexed as

Animal FeedVeterinariansAnimalsDietDogsFranceHumansPetsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesCanine nutrition, Biologically Appropriate Raw FoodNon-conventional dietsPet foodSurvey

Identifiers

PMID35509073
PMCPMC9066993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.