Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35508984›Full record

ReviewCellular & molecular biology letters2022

Protective effects of dexmedetomidine in vital organ injury: crucial roles of autophagy.

Shankun Zhao, Weizhou Wu, Xuezheng Lin, Maolei Shen, Zhenyu Yang, Sicong Yu, Yu Luo

Open access · goldAbstract readLetterReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular & molecular biology letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Perioperative Acute Kidney Injury and Anesthesia: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical practice and research · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shankun Zhao *Department of Urology, Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, 318000, Zhejiang, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0305-3912
Weizhou Wu *Department of Urology, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, 525000, Guangdong, China.
Xuezheng Lin *Department of Anesthesia Surgery, Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, 318000, China.
Maolei ShenDepartment of Urology, Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, 318000, Zhejiang, China.
Zhenyu YangDepartment of Anesthesia Surgery, Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, 318000, China.
Sicong YuDepartment of Anesthesia Surgery, Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, 318000, China.
Yu LuoDepartment of Anesthesia Surgery, Taizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, 318000, China. luoy@tzzxyy.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8586-5887
Taizhou Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vital organ injury is one of the leading causes of global deaths. Accumulating studies have demonstrated that dexmedetomidine (DEX) has an outstanding protective effect on multiple organs for its antiinflammatory and antiapoptotic properties, while the underlying molecular mechanism is not clearly understood. Autophagy, an adaptive catabolic process, has been found to play a crucial role in the organ-protective effects of DEX. Herein, we present a first attempt to summarize all the evidence on the proposed roles of autophagy in the action of DEX protecting against vital organ injuries via a comprehensive review. We found that most of the relevant studies (17/24, 71%) demonstrated that the modulation of autophagy was inhibited under the treatment of DEX on vital organ injuries (e.g. brain, heart, kidney, and lung), but several studies suggested that the level of autophagy was dramatically increased after administration of DEX. Albeit not fully elucidated, the underlying mechanisms governing the roles of autophagy involve the antiapoptotic properties, inhibiting inflammatory response, removing damaged mitochondria, and reducing oxidative stress, which might be facilitated by the interaction with multiple associated genes (i.e., hypoxia inducible factor-1α, p62, caspase-3, heat shock 70 kDa protein, and microRNAs) and signaling cascades (i.e., mammalian target of rapamycin, nuclear factor-kappa B, and c-Jun N-terminal kinases pathway). The authors conclude that DEX hints at a promising strategy in the management of vital organ injuries, while autophagy is crucially involved in the protective effect of DEX.

Indexed as

DexmedetomidineApoptosisAutophagyOxidative StressSignal TransductionDexmedetomidineAutophagyDexmedetomidine (DEX)MechanismOrgan injuryProtection

Identifiers

PMID35508984
PMCPMC9066865
OpenAlexW4229060265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.