Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35508928›Full record

ArticleAnnals of rehabilitation medicine2022

Early Return to Play After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Is It Worth the Risk?

László Török, Péter Jávor, Katalin Török, Ferenc Rárosi, Petra Hartmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of rehabilitation medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Knee proprioception following anterior cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

László TörökDepartment of Sports Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Péter JávorDepartment of Traumatology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Katalin TörökDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Physical Education, Budapest, Hungary.
Ferenc RárosiDepartment of Medical Physics and Informatics, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Petra HartmannDepartment of Traumatology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.

Funding

Human Resource Development Operational Programme EFOP-3.6.3-VEKOP-16-2017-00009Hungarian Science Academy BO/00605/21/5National Research Development and Innovation Office FK138839
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the outcomes of a 6-month-long accelerated rehabilitation with a 12-month-long rehabilitation. There is no consensus on the optimal duration of rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Trends in the past decades have shifted towards accelerated programs, often resulting in a return to play (RTP) at 4-6 months, postoperatively. However, longer rehabilitation cycles have recently experienced renaissance due to a greater understanding of graft remodeling.

methodsAdult athletes who underwent ACLR between 2015 and 2018 by the same surgeon were included and followed-up prospectively for 24 months. Participants were allocated into two groups based on their RTP (6 months vs. 12 months) and compared with graft elongation, reoperation rate, and sports career (quit or continue) outcomes.

resultsFifty-four patients underwent accelerated rehabilitation and 92 completed conventional rehabilitation. The accelerated rehabilitation was significantly associated with graft elongation-the accelerated rehabilitation group (n=9) and the conventional rehabilitation group (n=0), p<0.001-and need for reoperation-the accelerated rehabilitation group (n=5) and the conventional rehabilitation group (n=1), p=0.026. Although the relationship between rehabilitation time and quitting competitive sports did not reach significance at 0.05 level (p=0.063), it was significant when p<0.1, thereby showing a clear trend.

conclusionAccelerated rehabilitation increased graft elongation risk. Knee laxity ≥3 mm measured at 6 months after ACLR should be accompanied by RTP time frame re-evaluation. Arthrometry checkups or routine magnetic resonance imaging shortly after RTP may be considered in cases of accelerated rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Anterior cruciate ligamentLigamentsRehabilitationReturn to sportWounds and injuries

Identifiers

PMID35508928
PMCPMC9081394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.