Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35508922›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of nutrition2023

The cost and cost efficiency of conducting a 24-h dietary recall using INDDEX24, a mobile dietary assessment platform, compared with pen-and-paper interview in Viet Nam and Burkina Faso.

Katherine P Adams, Winnie Bell, Jérome W Somé, Brooke Colaiezzi, Sarah Wafa, Beatrice Rogers, Jennifer Coates

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katherine P AdamsInstitute for Global Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1060-2473
Winnie BellGerald J. and Dorothy R. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Jérome W SoméGerald J. and Dorothy R. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Brooke ColaiezziGerald J. and Dorothy R. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Sarah WafaGerald J. and Dorothy R. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Beatrice RogersGerald J. and Dorothy R. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Jennifer CoatesGerald J. and Dorothy R. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6510-3199

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-001600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The INDDEX24 Dietary Assessment Platform (INDDEX24) was developed to facilitate the collection of 24-h dietary recall (24HR) data. Alongside validation studies in Viet Nam and Burkina Faso in 2019-2020, we conducted activity-based costing studies to estimate the cost of conducting a 24HR among women of reproductive age using INDDEX24 compared with the pen-and-paper interview (PAPI) approach. We also modelled alternative scenarios in which: (1) 25-75 % of dietary reference data were borrowed from the INDDEX24 Global Food Matters Database (FMDB); (2) all study personnel were locally based and (3) national-scale surveys. In the primary analysis, in Viet Nam, the 24HR cost US $111 004 ($755/respondent,

Indexed as

DietNutrition AssessmentBurkina FasoFemaleHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesVietnam24-h dietary recallComputer-assisted personal interview (CAPI)CostCost efficiencyPen-and-paper interview (PAPI)

Identifiers

PMID35508922
PMCPMC9876804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.