Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35508885›Full record

ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2022

Adaptive Ultrasound Focusing Through the Cranial Bone for Non-invasive Treatment of Brain Disorders.

Thomas Bancel, Thomas Tiennot, Jean-François Aubry

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Circuit and Molecular Pathology in Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas BancelPhysics for Medicine Paris, INSERM U1273, ESPCI Paris, PSL University, CNRS UMR 8063, Paris, France.
Thomas TiennotPhysics for Medicine Paris, INSERM U1273, ESPCI Paris, PSL University, CNRS UMR 8063, Paris, France.
Jean-François AubryPhysics for Medicine Paris, INSERM U1273, ESPCI Paris, PSL University, CNRS UMR 8063, Paris, France. jean-francois.aubry@espci.psl.eu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Focused ultrasound holds great promise in therapy for its ability to target non-invasively deep seated tissues with non-ionizing therapeutic beams. Nevertheless, brain applications have been hampered for decades by the presence of the skull. The skull indeed strongly reflects, refracts and absorbs ultrasound, which defocuses the therapeutic ultrasound beams. In this chapter, we will first show how the structure of the skull impacts the ultrasound beams and how it narrows the frequency range that can be envisioned for transcranial therapy. We will then introduce different methods that have been developed and optimized to compensate the defocusing effect of the bone. Finally, we will provide an overview of past, current and future treatments of brain disorders.

Indexed as

Brain DiseasesUltrasonic TherapyBrainHumansSkullUltrasonographyAberration correctionBrain disordersTherapeutic ultrasoundTranscranial focusing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.