ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2022
Documenting the Anisotropic Stiffness of Hard Tissues with Resonant Ultrasound Spectroscopy.
Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in resonant ultrasound spectroscopy (RUS) leverage accurate measurements of the anisotropic stiffness of hard tissues at millimeter scale. RUS is the only available technique to date to assess the entire stiffness tensor of bone from a unique rectangular parallelepiped specimen. Accurately measured stiffness constants are required for bone mechanics models and may provide information on some fundamental aspects of hard tissues biology such as regulation of bone mass, remodeling and healing. In this chapter, we review the anisotropic stiffness data of human hard tissues measured with RUS, mostly during the last decade. Hard tissues covered here include human enamel and dentin, cortical bone from the femur and tibia of human adults, and child cortical bone tissue, accounting for 288 specimens in total. Data was collected in the literature and from previous works of our group. We performed a comparative study to depict the differences in the elastic properties of these hard tissues. Our objectives were to: (1) document the range of anisotropic stiffness constants in human hard tissues (orthotropic or transverse isotropic symmetry); and (2) provide empirical laws between mass density and anisotropic stiffness of cortical bone at different skeletal sites. Finally, we discuss the challenges and perspectives to use RUS for large collections of specimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.