Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35508876›Full record

ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2022

Ultrasound Scattering in Cortical Bone.

Yasamin Karbalaeisadegh, Marie Muller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yasamin KarbalaeisadeghDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Marie MullerDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA. mmuller2@ncsu.edu.

Funding

Assessment of bone micro-structure using ultrasonic methodsR03EB022743 · NIBIB · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI MULLER, MARIE · 2016 to 2017
$139k
NIBIB NIH HHS R03 EB022743
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in imaging of bone microstructure have led to a growing recognition of the role of cortical microstructure in osteoporosis. It is now accepted that the assessment of the microstructure of cortical porosity is essential to assess bone mechanical competence and predict fracture risk. Cortical porosity affects the propagation of ultrasound waves because pores act as ultrasound scatterers. Scattering by the porosity is an opportunity that should be leveraged to extract quantitative information about cortical microstructure. Scattering by the pores affects a number of ultrasound parameters that should be quantified, including attenuation, backscatter coefficient, ultrasound diffusivity, and their frequency dependence. Measuring these ultrasound parameters and developing models that describe their dependence upon parameters of cortical microstructure is the key to solve inverse problems that will allow the quantitative assessment of cortical porosity and ultimately will improve the non-invasive ultrasound-based evaluation of bone mechanical competence and fracture risk. In this chapter, we present recent advances in measuring and modeling those parameters in cortical bone.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneOsteoporosisBone and BonesBone DensityCortical BoneHumansPorosityUltrasonographyCortical boneCortical porosityUltrasound scattering

Identifiers

PMID35508876
PMCPMC10823499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.