Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35508874›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2022

Pulse-Echo Measurements of Bone Tissues. Techniques and Clinical Results at the Spine and Femur.

Delia Ciardo, Paola Pisani, Francesco Conversano, Sergio Casciaro

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Bone quality in endocrine diseases: determinants and clinical relevance.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Delia CiardoNational Research Council of Italy - Institute of Clinical Physiology, Lecce, Italy.
Paola PisaniNational Research Council of Italy - Institute of Clinical Physiology, Lecce, Italy.
Francesco ConversanoNational Research Council of Italy - Institute of Clinical Physiology, Lecce, Italy.
Sergio CasciaroNational Research Council of Italy - Institute of Clinical Physiology, Lecce, Italy. sergio.casciaro@cnr.it.
Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica · ITNational Research Council · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to review the available pulse-echo approaches for the quantitative evaluation of bone health status, with a specific application to the assessment of possible osteoporosis presence and to the fracture risk prediction. Along with a review of the main in-vivo imaging approaches for skeletal robustness evaluation and fracture risk assessment, further understanding into Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS), an ultrasound-based method measuring clinically relevant bone districts (i.e. lumbar vertebrae and proximal femur), is provided, and the further potentialities of this technology are discussed.Currently, the bone mineral density (BMD) provided by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is considered an established indicator for osteoporosis status assessment and fracture risk prediction, however, in order to obtain more accurate results, an additional step beyond BMD would be necessary, which means including data on bone quality for an improved evaluation of the disease and its consequences.REMS is a technology which allows both osteoporosis diagnosis, through the BMD estimation, and the prediction of fracture risk, through the computation of the Fragility Score; both measures are obtained by the automatic processing of unfiltered ultrasound signals acquired in correspondence of anatomical reference sites.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneOsteoporosisAbsorptiometry, PhotonBone and BonesBone DensityFemurHumansFemoral neckFracture risk assessmentLumbar spineOsteoporosis diagnosisRadiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS)

Identifiers

PMID35508874
OpenAlexW4285151132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.