Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35508768›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2022

Pancreatic Fistula and Biochemical Leak after Splenectomy: Incidence and Risk Factors-A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis.

A S Mehdorn, A K Schwieters, W A Mardin, N Senninger, B Strücker, A Pascher, T Vowinkel, F Becker

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Diagnostics and treatment of splenic abscesses].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A S MehdornDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany. anne-sophie.mehdorn@uksh.de.
A K SchwietersDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
W A MardinDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
N SenningerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
B StrückerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
A PascherDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
T Vowinkel *Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
F Becker *Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
University Hospital Münster · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePostoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a complication discussed in the context of pancreatic surgery, but may also result from splenectomy; a relationship that has not been investigated extensively yet.

methodsThis retrospective single-center study aimed to analyze incidence of and risk factors for POPF after splenectomy. Patient characteristics included demographic data, surgical procedure, and intra- and postoperative complications. POPF was defined according to the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery as POPF of grade B and C or biochemical leak (BL).

resultsOver ten years, 247 patients were identified, of whom 163 underwent primary (spleen-associated pathologies) and 84 secondary (extrasplenic oncological or technical reasons) splenectomy. Thirty-six patients (14.6%) developed POPF of grade B/C or BL, of which 13 occurred after primary (7.9%) and 23 after secondary splenectomy (27.3%). Of these, 25 (69.4%) were BL, 7 (19.4%) POPF of grade B and 4 (11.1%) POPF of grade C. BL were treated conservatively while three patients with POPF of grade B required interventional procedures and 4 with POPF of grade C required surgery. POPF and BL was noted significantly more often after secondary splenectomy and longer procedures. Multivariate analysis confirmed secondary splenectomy and use of energy-based devices as independent risk factors for development of POPF/BL after splenectomy.

conclusionWith an incidence of 4.5%, POPF is a relevant complication after splenectomy. The main risk factor identified was secondary splenectomy. Although POPF and BL can usually be treated conservatively, it should be emphasized when obtaining patients' informed consent and treated at centers with experience in pancreatic surgery.

Indexed as

Pancreatic FistulaSplenectomyHumansIncidencePancreaticoduodenectomyPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsComplicationsPostoperative pancreatic fistulaPrimary splenectomySplenectomy

Identifiers

PMID35508768
PMCPMC9468060
OpenAlexW4229053315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.