ArticleScientific reports2022
3D Reconstruction of cellular images from microfabricated imagers using fully-adaptive deep neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Omnidirectional Wireless Power Transfer for Millimetric Magnetoelectric Biomedical Implants.IEEE journal of solid-state circuits · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Millimeter-scale multi-cellular level imagers enable various applications, ranging from intraoperative surgical navigation to implantable sensors. However, the tradeoffs for miniaturization compromise resolution, making extracting 3D cell locations challenging-critical for tumor margin assessment and therapy monitoring. This work presents three machine-learning-based modules that extract spatial information from single image acquisitions using custom-made millimeter-scale imagers. The neural networks were trained on synthetically-generated (using Perlin noise) cell images. The first network is a convolutional neural network estimating the depth of a single layer of cells, the second is a deblurring module correcting for the point spread function (PSF). The final module extracts spatial information from a single image acquisition of a 3D specimen and reconstructs cross-sections, by providing a layered "map" of cell locations. The maximum depth error of the first module is 100 µm, with 87% test accuracy. The second module's PSF correction achieves a least-square-error of only 4%. The third module generates a binary "cell" or "no cell" per-pixel labeling with an accuracy ranging from 89% to 85%. This work demonstrates the synergy between ultra-small silicon-based imagers that enable in vivo imaging but face a trade-off in spatial resolution, and the processing power of neural networks to achieve enhancements beyond conventional linear optimization techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.