ArticleNeurology2022
Absence of Perilesional Neuroplastic Recruitment in Chronic Poststroke Aphasia.
Article in Neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Right hemisphere involvement in intensive aphasia therapy outcomes: a multimodal neuroimaging concept study.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Language comprehension in chronic aphasia relies on the language network, not the Multiple Demand network.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Dynamic functional reorganization in post-stroke aphasia: a state-of-the-art fMRI review from disease evolution to intervention.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Independent contributions of language activations in left and right temporal cortex to aphasia outcomes after stroke.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Neural Bases of Language Recovery After Stroke Can Only Be Fully Understood Through Longitudinal Studies of Individuals.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Charting the Course of Aphasia Recovery: Factors, Trajectories, and Outcomes.Annual review of linguistics · 2025Article
- Aphasia rehabilitation: a narrative review of adjuvant techniques.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Review
- The role of language-related functional brain regions and white matter tracts in network plasticity of post-stroke aphasia.Journal of neurology · 2024Review
- Disentangling neuroplasticity mechanisms in post-stroke language recovery.Brain and language · 2024Review
- Insights gained over 60 years on factors shaping post-stroke aphasia recovery: A commentary on Vignolo (1964).Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2024Article
- Rethinking Remapping: Circuit Mechanisms of Recovery after Stroke.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Review
- A Weak Shadow of Early Life Language Processing Persists in the Right Hemisphere of the Mature Brain.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2022Article
- Independent contributions of language activations in left and right temporal cortex to aphasia outcomes after stroke.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesA prominent theory proposes that neuroplastic recruitment of perilesional tissue supports aphasia recovery, especially when language-capable cortex is spared by smaller lesions. This theory has rarely been tested directly and findings have been inconclusive. We tested the perilesional plasticity hypothesis using 2 fMRI tasks in 2 groups of patients with previous aphasia diagnosis.
methodsTwo cohorts totaling 82 patients with chronic left-hemisphere stroke with previous aphasia diagnosis and 82 control participants underwent fMRI using either a naming task or a reliable semantic decision task. Individualized perilesional tissue was defined by dilating anatomical lesions and language regions were defined using meta-analyses. Mixed modeling examined differences in activity between groups. Relationships with lesion size and aphasia severity were examined.
resultsPatients exhibited reduced activity in perilesional language tissue relative to controls in both tasks. Although a few cortical regions exhibited greater activity irrespective of distance from the lesion, or only when distant from the lesion, no regions exhibited increased activity only when near the lesion. Larger lesions were associated with reduced language activity irrespective of distance from the lesion. Using the reliable fMRI task, reduced language activity was related to aphasia severity independent of lesion size. DISCUSSION: We found no evidence for neuroplastic recruitment of perilesional tissue in aphasia beyond its typical role in language. Rather, our findings are consistent with alternative hypotheses that changes in left-hemisphere activation during recovery relate to normalization of language network dysfunction and possibly recruitment of alternate cortical processors. These findings clarify left-hemisphere neuroplastic mechanisms supporting language recovery after stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.