Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35508398›Full record

ArticleNeurology2022

Absence of Perilesional Neuroplastic Recruitment in Chronic Poststroke Aphasia.

Andrew Tesla DeMarco, Candace van der Stelt, Sachi Paul, Elizabeth Dvorak, Elizabeth Lacey, Sarah Snider, Peter E Turkeltaub

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Insights gained over 60 years on factors shaping post-stroke aphasia recovery: A commentary on Vignolo (1964).Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2024
    Article
  11. Rethinking Remapping: Circuit Mechanisms of Recovery after Stroke.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrew Tesla DeMarcoFrom the Departments of Rehabilitation Medicine (A.T.D., P.E.T.) and Neurology (A.T.D., C.v.d.S., S.P., E.D., E.L., S.S., P.E.T.), Georgetown University; and MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital (E.L., P.E.T.), Washington, DC.
Candace van der SteltFrom the Departments of Rehabilitation Medicine (A.T.D., P.E.T.) and Neurology (A.T.D., C.v.d.S., S.P., E.D., E.L., S.S., P.E.T.), Georgetown University; and MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital (E.L., P.E.T.), Washington, DC.
Sachi PaulFrom the Departments of Rehabilitation Medicine (A.T.D., P.E.T.) and Neurology (A.T.D., C.v.d.S., S.P., E.D., E.L., S.S., P.E.T.), Georgetown University; and MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital (E.L., P.E.T.), Washington, DC.
Elizabeth DvorakFrom the Departments of Rehabilitation Medicine (A.T.D., P.E.T.) and Neurology (A.T.D., C.v.d.S., S.P., E.D., E.L., S.S., P.E.T.), Georgetown University; and MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital (E.L., P.E.T.), Washington, DC.
Elizabeth LaceyFrom the Departments of Rehabilitation Medicine (A.T.D., P.E.T.) and Neurology (A.T.D., C.v.d.S., S.P., E.D., E.L., S.S., P.E.T.), Georgetown University; and MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital (E.L., P.E.T.), Washington, DC.
Sarah SniderFrom the Departments of Rehabilitation Medicine (A.T.D., P.E.T.) and Neurology (A.T.D., C.v.d.S., S.P., E.D., E.L., S.S., P.E.T.), Georgetown University; and MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital (E.L., P.E.T.), Washington, DC.
Peter E TurkeltaubFrom the Departments of Rehabilitation Medicine (A.T.D., P.E.T.) and Neurology (A.T.D., C.v.d.S., S.P., E.D., E.L., S.S., P.E.T.), Georgetown University; and MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital (E.L., P.E.T.), Washington, DC. turkeltp@georgetown.edu.

Funding

Translational Biomedical Science Training GrantTL1TR001431 · NCATS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI LEE, DEXTER L, SANDBERG, KATHRYN L · 2015 to 2024
$4.8M
Contributions of spared brain structures and connections to aphasia recoveryR01DC014960 · NIDCD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI TURKELTAUB, PETER ETHAN · 2017 to 2021
$4.0M
Neurorehabilitation and Restorative Neuroscience NetworkK12HD093427 · NICHD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI BREGMAN, BARBARA S, DROMERICK, ALEXANDER W · 2017 to 2021
$3.9M
Stroke National Capital Area Network for Research (SCANR)U10NS086513 · NINDS · MEDSTAR HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI DROMERICK, ALEXANDER W, HSIA, AMIE · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
Georgetown-Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translational Science (GHUKL2TR000102 · NCATS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MELLMAN, THOMAS A, VERBALIS, JOSEPH G · 2012 to 2014
$1.7M
Functional anomaly mapping of aphasia recoveryR00DC018828 · NIDCD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI DEMARCO, ANDREW T · 2023 to 2025
$747k
Functional anomaly mapping of aphasia recoveryK99DC018828 · NIDCD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI DEMARCO, ANDREW T · 2021 to 2022
$242k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000102NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001431NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD093427NIDCD NIH HHS K99 DC018828NIDCD NIH HHS R00 DC018828NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014960NINDS NIH HHS U10 NS086513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesA prominent theory proposes that neuroplastic recruitment of perilesional tissue supports aphasia recovery, especially when language-capable cortex is spared by smaller lesions. This theory has rarely been tested directly and findings have been inconclusive. We tested the perilesional plasticity hypothesis using 2 fMRI tasks in 2 groups of patients with previous aphasia diagnosis.

methodsTwo cohorts totaling 82 patients with chronic left-hemisphere stroke with previous aphasia diagnosis and 82 control participants underwent fMRI using either a naming task or a reliable semantic decision task. Individualized perilesional tissue was defined by dilating anatomical lesions and language regions were defined using meta-analyses. Mixed modeling examined differences in activity between groups. Relationships with lesion size and aphasia severity were examined.

resultsPatients exhibited reduced activity in perilesional language tissue relative to controls in both tasks. Although a few cortical regions exhibited greater activity irrespective of distance from the lesion, or only when distant from the lesion, no regions exhibited increased activity only when near the lesion. Larger lesions were associated with reduced language activity irrespective of distance from the lesion. Using the reliable fMRI task, reduced language activity was related to aphasia severity independent of lesion size. DISCUSSION: We found no evidence for neuroplastic recruitment of perilesional tissue in aphasia beyond its typical role in language. Rather, our findings are consistent with alternative hypotheses that changes in left-hemisphere activation during recovery relate to normalization of language network dysfunction and possibly recruitment of alternate cortical processors. These findings clarify left-hemisphere neuroplastic mechanisms supporting language recovery after stroke.

Indexed as

AphasiaStrokeBrainHumansLanguageMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuronal Plasticity

Identifiers

PMID35508398
PMCPMC9280993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.