Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35508336›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Impact of an e-cigarette tax on cigarette and e-cigarette use in a middle-income country: a study from Indonesia using a pre-post design.

Sarah D Kowitt, Dien Anshari, Elizabeth N Orlan, KyungSu Kim, Leah M Ranney, Adam O Goldstein, M Justin Byron

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah D KowittLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA kowitt@email.unc.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5216-3897
Dien AnshariDepartment of Health Education & Behavioral Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia.
Elizabeth N OrlanDepartment of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
KyungSu KimLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Leah M RanneyDepartment of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9766-4767
Adam O GoldsteinLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
M Justin ByronLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1162-9907
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Indonesia · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIndonesia implemented its first e-cigarette regulation in 2018, a 57% tax on the retail price of e-cigarette liquid (e-liquid), exceeding the 40% average tax on cigarettes. Economic research suggests that this tax could unintentionally increase cigarette smoking among dual users, but this has not been examined in a low-income or middle-income country. We therefore investigated the effects of the e-liquid tax among adults in Indonesia.

designPre-post study.

settingIndonesia.

participantsAdults who currently used e-cigarettes and either currently or occasionally smoked cigarettes or recently quit were recruited using Facebook and Instagram ads. Our follow-up response rate was 79%. A final sample of 1039 adults participated. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: E-cigarette and cigarette use.

resultsFollowing the e-liquid tax, participants reported paying a 4.4% higher price for e-liquid (p=0.02). Participants also reported an average 0.5-day decrease in the number of days they used e-cigarettes in the past week (p<0.001), and the proportion of daily e-cigarette users decreased (75.9% to 63.6%; p<0.001). Overall, reported use of cigarettes also declined, on average, by nine cigarettes per week. Participants who reported decreasing their e-cigarette use had higher odds of reporting increasing their cigarette use rather than reporting no change (adjusted OR: 2.99; 95% CI: 1.95 to 4.59). Further, as participants reported using e-cigarettes less frequently, they reported using cigarettes more frequently (β=-2.41, p=0.007).

conclusionsFollowing an e-liquid tax in Indonesia, prices of e-liquid increased slightly, e-cigarette and cigarette use declined, and people who reported decreasing their e-cigarette use reported increasing their cigarette use. To avoid encouraging cigarette use, a prudent approach would be to raise cigarette taxes concurrently with e-cigarette taxes.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsVapingAdultCommerceHumansIndonesiaTaxesHealth policyPublic healthPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID35508336
PMCPMC9073394
OpenAlexW4229006021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.