Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35508167›Full record

ReviewMolecular cell2022

Walking a tightrope: The complex balancing act of R-loops in genome stability.

Joshua R Brickner, Jada L Garzon, Karlene A Cimprich

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular cell, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 163 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
163citing papers in PubMed
18.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

163 citing papers in PubMed, 228 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

103 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joshua R BricknerDepartment of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Jada L GarzonDepartment of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Karlene A CimprichDepartment of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: cimprich@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USStanford Medicine · US

Funding

Transcription-Associated Genome InstabilityR01GM119334 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Karlene A Cimprich · 2016 to 2026
$4.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM119334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although transcription is an essential cellular process, it is paradoxically also a well-recognized cause of genomic instability. R-loops, non-B DNA structures formed when nascent RNA hybridizes to DNA to displace the non-template strand as single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), are partially responsible for this instability. Yet, recent work has begun to elucidate regulatory roles for R-loops in maintaining the genome. In this review, we discuss the cellular contexts in which R-loops contribute to genomic instability, particularly during DNA replication and double-strand break (DSB) repair. We also summarize the evidence that R-loops participate as an intermediate during repair and may influence pathway choice to preserve genomic integrity. Finally, we discuss the immunogenic potential of R-loops and highlight their links to disease should they become pathogenic.

Indexed as

R-Loop StructuresTranscription, GeneticDNADNA RepairDNA ReplicationDNA, Single-StrandedGenomic InstabilityHumansDNADNA, Single-StrandedDNA damagedouble-strand break repairgenome stabilityreplication stressR-loop pathologyR-loopsRNA-DNA hybrid

Identifiers

PMID35508167
PMCPMC9233011
OpenAlexW4225316996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.