Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35508148›Full record

ArticlePhysiological measurement2022

Establishing best practices in photoplethysmography signal acquisition and processing.

Peter H Charlton, Kristjan Pilt, Panicos A Kyriacou

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological measurement, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The 2023 wearable photoplethysmography roadmap.Physiological measurement · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peter H CharltonDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3836-8655
Kristjan PiltDepartment of Health Technologies, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0003-2422-0430
Panicos A KyriacouResearch Centre for Biomedical Engineering, City, University of London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2868-485X

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/20/20/34626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photoplethysmography is now widely utilised by clinical devices such as pulse oximeters, and wearable devices such as smartwatches. It holds great promise for health monitoring in daily life. This editorial considers whether it would be possible and beneficial to establish best practices for photoplethysmography signal acquisition and processing. It reports progress made towards this, balanced with the challenges of working with a diverse range of photoplethysmography device designs and intended applications, each of which could benefit from different approaches to signal acquisition and processing. It concludes that there are several potential benefits to establishing best practices. However, it is not yet clear whether it is possible to establish best practices which hold across the range of photoplethysmography device designs and applications.

Indexed as

PhotoplethysmographyWearable Electronic DevicesHeart RateOximetrySignal Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID35508148
PMCPMC9136485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.